Search for: "MATTER OF STATE v. Italian Line"
Results 1 - 20
of 172
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2019, 12:48 pm
However, that court has also confirmed that, while Article 10(2) ECHR leaves little room for restrictions on freedom of expression in political matters, Contracting States enjoy a wide margin of discretion when they regulate freedom of expression in the commercial field (see, eg, Ashby Donald, para 39).In any event, the potential conflict between freedom of expression - whether commercial or artistic - and image rights has also emerged elsewhere, including in the US. [read post]
5 Jan 2023, 12:40 am
International – Compagnia Generale Distribuzione s.p.a. v Zorro Productions Inc.).In delivering its new judgment in the long-running (15+ years and counting!) [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 2:43 am
For instance, in Imar v. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 2:48 pm
Airbnb, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Jul 2018, 3:05 am
The Milan court held that this requires consideration - in line with the CJEU decision in Ergo Insurance - of the Rome II Regulation. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:27 am
Italia On Line of 7 June 2011. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 11:42 pm
State Immunity, Violation of Human Rights and the Individual’s Right for Reparations – A Comment on the ICJ’s Judgment of February 2, 2012 (Germany v. [read post]
13 Nov 2011, 7:00 pm
In the recent Decision on Jurisdiction and Admissibility in Abaclat and others v Argentina the majority of the ICSID tribunal affirmed its jurisdiction over claims alleging breach of the Argentina-Italy BIT of approximately 60,000 Italian investors. [read post]
26 Aug 2012, 10:24 am
The recent case of Cappello v. [read post]
20 Apr 2013, 2:12 pm
Co., Ltd. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:02 pm
A recent example is the decision of the Italian Supreme Court in judgment no. 23292, of 13 November 2015, in the case of design infringement (Metalco S.p.a., Metalco S.r.l. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2012, 5:23 pm
The United States Supreme Court in Shute v. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 6:14 pm
Cigna Healthplans, 21 Cal. 4th 1066, 988 P.2d 67 (1999) (public injunctive relief claims not arbitrable as a matter of California public policy; California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA) injunctive actions), and Cruz v. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:03 am
Document D1 was therefore comprised in the state of the art according to Article 54(3) EPC.The opposition division further held that claim 1 of the first and second auxiliary requests filed during the oral proceedings before the opposition division on 7 December 2010 did not contain subject-matter which extended beyond the content of the application as filed (Article 100(c) EPC in combination with Article 123(2) EPC), but that the subject-matter of said claims did not… [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 8:31 am
Doctrinally, Bank Markazi’s argument was based on a 19th Century precedent, United States v. [read post]
28 May 2009, 12:16 pm
Alitalia-Linee Aeree Italiane-Socita Per Azioni, 549 F.Supp.2d 549 (S.D.N.Y. 2008). [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 2:10 pm
The Second Circuit first heard the matter on December 10, 1007. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 7:42 am
As Advocate General Sharpston noted in her Opinion, the Tribunale di Milano had already found that, in line with the case-law of the Italian courts, videogames such as those in issue could not be regarded simply as computer programs. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 11:58 am
" Carnival Cruise Lines, Inc. v. [read post]
