Search for: "MATTER OF STRAUS v. Power" Results 1 - 19 of 19
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jun 2020, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**As to Officer's allegation that hearsay evidence had been considered by the ADC in his arriving at his determination, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Rosa v New York City Hous. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
**As to Officer's allegation that hearsay evidence had been considered by the ADC in his arriving at his determination, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Rosa v New York City Hous. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 10:38 am
When faced with an enemy too powerful to engage directly you must first weaken him by undermining his foundation and attacking his source of power. [read post]
15 Jul 2012, 6:21 pm
The fees, which currently do not apply to the first three days of trial, but are $500 for each day for the 4th through 10thday of trial, and $800 for each day thereafter are charged to the party who sets a matter down for trial pursuant to Schedule C of the Supreme Court Civil Rules.Vilardell v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 7:35 am
A mechanism of this sort strips the Union of its powers and is unacceptable. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 5:29 pm by Chuck Cosson
  Or, perhaps more directly, that while we all know human agency matters, we all too frequently overlook that point. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am by rainey Reitman
Resources Legal Cases Bobbs-Merrill Co. v Straus (Historic Case Re First-Sale Doctrine) UMG v Augusto (EFF Victory re First Sale and License Conditions) When is a ‘License’ Really a Sale? [read post]
31 Mar 2009, 1:57 pm
  That approach was also affirmed by the current Supreme Court in the ITW v. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Furthermore, according to the prevailing view, it seems that a publication, no matter how innocent in itself, may be enjoined if it is made in pursuance of a scheme which has an enjoinable element. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 9:00 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
ARTICLE V Neither of the contracting Parties shall be bound to deliver up its own citizens or subjects under the stipulations of this convention. [read post]
29 May 2018, 3:26 am by Sander van Rijnswou
You can't slice up a priority rightToday we have the  first instance decision in the opposition against European patent 2771468 having the title "ENGINEERING OF SYSTEMS, METHODS AND OPTIMIZED GUIDE COMPOSITIONS FOR SEQUENCE MANIPULATION" (PCT/US13/74819). [read post]
24 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by cap95
Lofgren describes the process and procedures for conducting the hearings in the Statement of the Chair Regarding the Matters of Representative Charles B. [read post]
24 Jan 2016, 8:47 am by Thomas Valenti
Also there is mandatory referral of both criminal matters and civil matters. [read post]
11 Oct 2023, 1:23 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The same documents D20 and D21 as used in the opposition proceedings concerning the patent in suit were invoked against the subject-matter of the application in suit. [read post]