Search for: "MAY v. SCOTT" Results 101 - 120 of 4,796
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2023, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Arizona – Two Groups Making New Bid to Hide Names of Donors in Political Races Arizona Capitol Times – Howard Fischer (Capitol News Services) | Published: 11/7/2023 Attorney Scott Freeman acknowledges that Maricopa County Superior Court Judge Scott McCoy rejected his bid to void Proposition 211. [read post]
9 Nov 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
At times, it may be appealing to set regulatory policy through enforcement actions. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
A cause of action for legal malpractice cannot be stated in the absence of an attorney-client relationship ( Windsor Metal Fabrications, Ltd. v Scott & Schechtman, 286 A.D.2d 732 [2d Dept. 2001]). [read post]
24 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Kate Huddleston
They may be released after time served, but it will give them a criminal record. [read post]
22 Oct 2023, 3:51 am by jonathanturley
Moreover, the courts have rejected the use of exclusion in Powell v. [read post]
20 Oct 2023, 2:40 pm by CFM Admin
Ongoing litigation initiated by industry participants may further delay the effectiveness of these rules. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by John-Paul Boyd KC
Page limits have the obvious effect of reducing the volume of materials the arbitrator may need to read and speeding up the process of getting to an award. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 4:30 pm by INFORRM
For example, in Green Corns Ltd v Claverley Group Ltd [2005] EWHC 958 (QB) (18 May 2005) [h/t Andrew Scott] Tugendhat J granted an injunction restraining a local newspaper from publishing the addresses of homes provided for troubled children. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 7:41 am by Norman L. Eisen
Expand all Collapse all Relevant Court Proceedings United States v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 9:50 am by Zak Gowen
While the Draft Guidelines may be instructive, the antitrust agencies notably do not offer any bright lines about “how much”—and under what circumstances—horizontal shareholding may be illegal. [read post]