Search for: "MCDONALD POLICE v. Geneva"
Results 1 - 20
of 32
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Dec 2010, 3:42 am
Div., 252 AD2d 82, Motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 1000[Decided with Andriano v City of Schenectady, motion for leave to appeal denied, 93 NY2d 999]In McDonald Police Benevolent Association v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326, the Court of Appeals ruled that there was no legal impediment to the City of Geneva’s unilateral alteration of “a past practice ... unrelated to any entitlement expressly conferred upon retirees in a… [read post]
13 Sep 2010, 3:56 am
Retiree health insurance benefitsAeneas McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, App. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined: "A municipal resolution is, in general, a unilateral action that is temporary in nature and, thus, it does not create any vested contractual rights", citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
8 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division opined: "A municipal resolution is, in general, a unilateral action that is temporary in nature and, thus, it does not create any vested contractual rights", citing Matter of Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 3:37 am
”The Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Association, Inc. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 3:17 am
”The Circuit Court said “This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire” as the phrase “shall be provided” in the Plan refers to “retired employees,” rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 4:00 am
"The Circuit Court said "This language cannot be reasonably interpreted to explicitly state that benefits vested as soon as a worker became eligible for a pension or to retire" as the phrase "shall be provided" in the Plan refers to "retired employees," rather than to current employees who might retire in the future.There have been a number of cases addressing the continuation of health insurance coverage upon retirement decided by New York courts.In… [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 2:30 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
City of Schenectady, 244 AD2d 845 (3rd Dep't 1997).Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
City of Schenectady, 244 AD2d 845 (3rd Dep't 1997).Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
City of Schenectady, 244 AD2d 845 (3rd Dep't 1997).Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
City of Schenectady, 244 AD2d 845 (3rd Dep't 1997).Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
21 Jul 2021, 4:00 am
Defendants' reliance on McDonald Police v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 11:12 am
McDonald had seen enough. [read post]
18 Jul 2019, 4:00 am
** * The decision notes that City "presented ample evidence that it passed the 2010 Ordinance only after pursuing a range of measures to increase revenue and cut expenses" and although New York law permitted the City to require the appellants to contribute up to 50 percent of the premium amount, the 2010 Ordinance required the Retirees to contribute substantially less.** In McDonald PBA v City of Geneva, Ct. of Appeals, 92 N.Y.2d 326, the Court of… [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:00 am
Significantly, said the Appellate Division, as the petitioners are now retireed, the School District does not have a statutory duty to bargain with them within the meaning of the Taylor Law, citing Aeneas McDonald Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Geneva, 92 NY2d 326. [read post]
