Search for: "ME Med. Ctr. v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Nov 2017, 6:45 am by MBettman
Key Precedent Fourteenth Amendment (“All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside. [read post]
24 Mar 2025, 10:25 am by Guest Author
But it would not obviously mean, for example, that the United States could not sue Cause Based Commerce to collect its fair share of the USF support costs. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:02 am by SC Divorce and Disabilty
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINAIn The Court of AppealsRobert Guinan, Appellant, v. [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
29 Jan 2025, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In support of its argument that NJT was an "arm of the state" entitled to invoke sovereign immunity, defendants cited a decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit holding that NJT is entitled to invoke sovereign immunity in federal court (see Karns v Shanahan, 879 F3d 504, 519 [3d Cir 2018]). [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]