Search for: "MEDTRONIC, INC" Results 201 - 220 of 1,087
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 6:32 am
" The suits "name at least four companies whose products are among those used in surgery to treat the heart condition," including "AtriCure Inc., Medtronic Inc., St. [read post]
8 Aug 2007, 9:31 am
Medtronic Vascular, Inc., No. 06-1434 (Fed. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 2:10 pm
NY-based Acorda Therapeutics, Inc. has licensed worldwide development and commercialization rights to a proprietary magnesium formula (referred to as AC105) from Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 5:56 pm
Medtronic Inc., which came down in February, the Court ruled 8-1 that federal medical-device regulations preempt state product liability suits unless there â [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 5:55 am by Tom Lamb
District Court Judge Richard Kyle, who was overseeing the federal court Sprint Fidelis MDL -- In Re Medtronic Inc. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 6:29 am
"A team at Gibson Dunn & Crutcher led by Los Angeles-based partner Daniel Floyd represented Medtronic MiniMed, a division of Medtronic, Inc. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 2:39 pm by Page Pate
Copyrighted Material by The Pate Law Firm The Department of Justice (DOJ) has announced a $9.9 million settlement with Fridley, Minnesota-based Medtronic Inc., a medical device manufacturer, resolving allegations that the company made payments to physicians in order to boost the use of its pacemakers and defibrillators. [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 7:03 am by Robert Kraft
The Wall Street Journal reported Medtronic Inc. has been blocked from marketing its new CoreValve heart valve in the US, following an injunction issued by a Federal court. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 2:16 pm by Matthew A. Reed
Medtronic Inc. (676 F.3d 1159 (9th Cir. 2012)) left plaintiffs who sue the manufacturers of pre-market approved devices precious little in the way of potential state-law claims that are not expressly preempted by Riegel or impliedly preempted by Buckman. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 9:43 am
(Denver Post, Feb. 25) From the decision (Medtronic Navigation, Inc. v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 6:22 am
Now this: a separate jury has ruled that Boston Scientific must pay rival Medtronic Inc. $250 million in a patent-infringement lawsuit involving devices to remove blockages in coronary arteries. [read post]