Search for: "MERCK SHARP " Results 81 - 100 of 267
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2009, 7:18 pm
Building Trades Plan on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated • Defendants: Merck & Co., Inc.; Merck Sharp & Dohme Pharmaceuticals SRL Antitrust action for monopolization of the market for montelukast sodium products (Merck's... [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 2:05 am
Margaret Thatcher's birth place in Grantham  Source Wikipedia According to Wikiquote, "frit" is an unusual Lincolnshire dialect abbreviation of 'frightened' which Mrs Thatcher evidently recalled from her Grantham childhood. [read post]
9 Jun 2020, 9:56 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 2:45 am by sally
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 382 (08 April 2011) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Williams v Central Bank of Nigeria [2011] EWHC 876 (QB) (08 April 2011) The Legal Services Commission v F & Ors [2011] EWHC 899 (QB) (08 April 2011) High Court (Chancery Division) Moria & Anor v Bednash [2011] EWHC 839 (Ch) (08 April 2011) Batt v Royal Mail [2011] EWHC 900 (Ch) (08 April 2011) High Court… [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 4:48 am by Layla Kuhl
In Attorney General v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, the Court of Appeals panel majority held that “plaintiffs’ allegations fall within the statutory definition of “product liability  action,”  because  plaintiffs  have  asserted  legal  and  equitable  theories  of  liability  for damage to property resulting from the production of a product. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 12:28 pm
" This April 30 article also draws upon testimony given at the trial of the civil suit filed by Graeme Peterson -- who suffered a heart attack in 2003 while on Vioxx -- against Merck and its Australian subsidiary, Merck, Sharp & Dohme Australia (MSDA): In testimony provided at the trial last week, which was obtained by The Scientist, George Jelinek, an Australian physician and long-time member of the World Association of Medical Editors, reviewed four… [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 4:57 am by Ben Vernia
According to DOJ’s press release: American pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp & Dohme has agreed to pay $950 million to resolve criminal charges and civil claims related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx® (rofecoxib), the Justice Department announced today. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 11:47 am by Holman
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., 2022 WL 4541687 (Fed. [read post]
23 May 2019, 3:29 am by Edith Roberts
Subscript Law offers a graphic explainer for Monday’s opinion in Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
Spanish anitrust agency Comisión Nacional de los Mercados y la Compentencia (CNMC) Tuesday fined US pharmaceutical company Merck Sharp and Dohme (MSD) 39 million euros for abuse of the market. [read post]
4 Nov 2017, 5:47 am
They look a little different, but the Dutch Supreme Courtsays that they should be treated just the same  Yesterday afternoon, the AmeriKat's Dutch friend, Professor Tobias Cohen Jehoram (De Brauw Blackstone Westbroek) sent her, hot of the press, a copy of the Dutch Supreme Court's decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme v Teva delivered yesterday morning. [read post]
26 May 2021, 8:40 pm by Adeline Chong
Written by Professor Yeo Tiong Min, SC (honoris causa), Yong Pung How Chair Professor of Law, Yong Pung How School of Law, Singapore Management University In Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Merck KGaA [2021] SGCA 14, a full bench of the Singapore Court of Appeal addressed the limits of transnational issue estoppel in Singapore law, and flagged possible fundamental changes to the common law on the recognition and enforcement of foreign judgments in Singapore. [read post]