Search for: "MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA" Results 81 - 100 of 2,977
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by renholding
If adopted, this legislation would have a global impact, as California is the fifth largest economy in the world, and companies around the world sell into California. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 9:04 pm by Series of Essays
Supreme Court holds that states lack standing to challenge immigration prioritization guidelines. _____________________________________________________________________ With Its Student Loan Decision, the Court Again Limits Agency Authority July 20, 2023 | Kate Shaw, Cardozo Law School, and Crawford Schneider, University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School In Biden v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Under this theory, the Supreme Court held in American Electric Power v. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 1:03 pm by Ryan Goodman
Eddington (Senior Fellow, Cato Institute)“Lessons Learned and Caveats for the Future: The January 6, 2021, Attempted Insurrection”Expert Statement Mary Anne Franks (Professor of Law and Michael R. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 2:21 pm by Kendall Lowery
Ryan McGinley-Stempel, rmcginleystempel@publiclawgroup.com; Michael Slattery, mslattery@publiclawgroup.com The post California Supreme Courts Limits Governmental Immunity Statute That California Courts of Appeal Had Read More Broadly first appeared on Renne Public Law Group. [read post]
3 Jul 2023, 4:07 am by INFORRM
The Michael Geist blog has more information here. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 3:17 pm by Stacie Rosenzweig
We’ve missed a few things while I was gone:The judge in the Mata v. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm by Jacob Fishman
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:29 pm by Aaron Moss
In one particularly fulsome analysis of copyright and rhythm, a Louisiana district court in Batiste v. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 2:13 pm
  This case shows that Oliver, too, is still having ripple effects, here in an obscure corner of California civil procedure.And "Emory Law School’s Michael Broyde says a panel of chief judges of the US circuit courts of appeal should review disputed recusal decisions made by Supreme Court justices. [read post]