Search for: "MICHAEL v. CALIFORNIA" Results 101 - 120 of 2,972
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Jun 2022, 8:02 am by Ron Coleman
Michael Atkins says, “Here we go again”: With the Northern District of California’s understandable decision this week in Phase Forward Inc. v. [read post]
4 Mar 2007, 9:09 pm
In case you imagine that tobacco companies' litigation problems are going away -- notwithstanding the damaging California ruling discussed by Michael two weeks ago, the equivocal outcome in Philip Morris v. [read post]
23 Feb 2010, 9:09 pm by Walter Olson
Other comments (besides Michael's) on Supreme Court's opinion reversing Ninth Circuit on corporate jurisdiction in Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
by Michael Kun   The other day, an attorney told me he believes that the decade-long wave of misclassification class actions in California is all but over. [read post]
13 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Patent Docs
By Michael Borella -- Patentee McRO sued a number of video game developers and publishers in the Central District of California and the District of Delaware for alleged infringement of U.S. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 12:23 pm by H. Scott Leviant
The California Supreme Court dropped a pretty big opinion in the wage and hour world today, reversing the Court of Appeal in Augustus v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 9:26 am
This is the first in a series monitoring the impact of the California budget crisis on redevelopment agencies. [read post]
6 Oct 2015, 3:27 pm
The latest issue of Los Angeles Lawyer has an article by Michael Shipley titled "Maroney's Minefield: California's complicated rules for obtaining a new trial can lead all but the most careful to an unfair result" starting on page 29, about Maroney v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:21 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
We have recently added New Jersey law to the app, as well as updated it to reflect changes in California law following the long awaited Brinker v. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 12:31 pm by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
We have recently added New Jersey law to the app, as well as updated it to reflect changes in California law following the long awaited Brinker v. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 11:49 am by M. Mau
As previously reported, in Catherine Way v. [read post]
5 Mar 2008, 2:08 pm
Michael Katz, a student at USF Law, sent this: From page 3 of the CA Bar July 2008 Exam Laptop Requirements (PDF): “Apple Macintosh Users: Users with Apple’s MAC OSX v. 10.4.4 (Tiger) or Mac OSX v. 10.5 (Leopard) laptops can run SofTest in Windows XP or Vista installed via Apple’s Bootcamp. [read post]