Search for: "MILLER v. BARNETT" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
The court held that the FTC had applied the wrong legal standard in evaluating Illumina’s “open offer” (see me here; Alden Abbott here and here; Jonathan Barnett here; and the International Center for Law & Economics’ (ICLE) amicus brief here). [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm by INFORRM
The phone hacking saga continues with Byline Investigates reporting that Sienna Miller and Sir Simon Hughes have launched claims against the Sun. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
Barnette, No. 591, Supreme Court of the United States, October Term, 1942, at 46. [read post]
14 Nov 2018, 3:01 am by Walter Olson
” [Andrew Trask, Gilbert Hyatt v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
25 Dec 2017, 9:40 pm by The Regulatory Review
Supreme Court’s recent decision in Endrew F. v. [read post]
30 Apr 2017, 6:31 am by INFORRM
Sooban v Badal, listed for 3 days, beginning on 3 May 2017. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
’  We had posts about this by Steve Barnett and Martin Moore. [read post]
3 Oct 2016, 5:53 am by Eugene Volokh
Gonzalez-Lopez, 548 U.S. 140, 144 (2006) (likewise); Miller v. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 11:43 am by Andrew Hamm
In contrast, Barnett pointed to the Court’s 1896 decision in Plessy v. [read post]