Search for: "MINISTER v. STATE"
Results 81 - 100
of 3,973
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2007, 3:00 am
Heyer v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 4:06 pm
Assange v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 6:25 am
Namely, AOWF needed submit further documents to the Scottish Ministers for approval stating how it planned to undertake the development of the Wind Farm. [read post]
5 Jan 2011, 8:54 am
Source : Times of IndiaA defamation suit filed by Delhi chief minister Sheila Dikshit against state BJP president Vijender Gupta in the Delhi High Court is likely to be heard in May this year. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 2:00 pm
In Brown v. [read post]
4 Oct 2011, 2:50 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Equality and Human Rights Commission v Prime Minister & Ors [2011] EWHC 2401 (Admin) (03 October 2011) AM v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2486 (Admin) (03 October 2011) Mahajna ( Salah ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Cockburn, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for Health [2011] EWHC 2445 (Admin)… [read post]
13 Nov 2023, 12:37 pm
" Reminds me of Parts V and VI of Prof. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:29 am
” Greenpeace France also called this current case, Notre Affaire à Tous and Others v. [read post]
7 Oct 2016, 11:10 pm
All of this would equally apply to a contingency at the State level, like the one which V Venkatesan points out. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 3:47 pm
(Headley v Church of Scientology, Int’l, July 24, 2012). [read post]
23 Nov 2013, 11:16 am
” The court analogized to Texas Monthly, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:08 pm
The court reasoned that there is a duty imposed on the State and all organs of state not to perform any act that infringes the rights entrenched in the Bill of Rights. [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 11:08 pm
The court reasoned that there is a duty imposed on the State and all organs of state not to perform any act that infringes the rights entrenched in the Bill of Rights. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:54 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) AR & FW, R (on the application of) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2009] EWCA Civ 1310 (04 December 2009) Prison Officers Association v Iqbal (Rev 1) [2009] EWCA Civ 1312 (04 December 2009) High Court (Administrative Court) Newport City Council, R (on the application of) v The Welsh Ministers [2009] [...] [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 12:07 pm
In Hosanna-Tabor Church v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:38 pm
The post Not quite, Minister by Giles Peaker appeared first on Nearly Legal: Housing Law News and Comment. [read post]
10 May 2010, 7:35 am
High Court (Administrative Court) Public & Commercial Services Union, R (on the application of) v Minister for the Civil Service [2010] EWHC 1027 (Admin) (10 May 2010) BX v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2010] EWHC 990 (Admin) (10 May 2010) S v Northampton Crown Court & Anor [2010] EWHC 723 (Admin) (07 May 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) IRB Brasil Resseguros SA v CX Reinsurance Company Ltd [2010] EWHC 974 (Comm) (07 May… [read post]
20 Jan 2012, 6:09 am
In a decision released on January 11, 2012, the Supreme Court of the United States ruled unanimously that a “called” teacher is a “minister” covered by the ministerial exception, grounded in Religion Clauses of the First Amendment, and that the ministerial exception operated as an affirmative defense, not a jurisdictional bar, to employment discrimination claims against a religious employer.The case, Hosanna–Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School… [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 1:39 am
The Superstrike v. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 pm
The KSC dismissed as improvidently granted a state's petition for review preserving Mark Schoenhofer's win in State v. [read post]
