Search for: "MITCHELL v. STATE"
Results 221 - 240
of 2,012
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2021, 10:56 am
Rosen’s article Katcoff v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 2:24 pm
Wade and Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
30 Nov 2021, 1:26 am
They point to an earlier parochial school funding case, Mitchell v. [read post]
29 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
In Dobbs v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 5:00 am
State law distinguishes the two. [read post]
21 Nov 2021, 9:22 am
DIST. 94 v. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 8:34 am
This position parallels the United States Supreme Court's current approach to the Free Exercise Clause pursuant to Employment Division v. [read post]
15 Nov 2021, 4:26 am
Kahn III, last week handed down its decision in Kinyk v Hart, this time denying the motion on the merits. [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
"When evidentiary material outside the pleading's four corners is considered, and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the pleader has a cause of action, not whether the pleader has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate" (Matter of Clavin v… [read post]
12 Nov 2021, 4:00 am
"When evidentiary material outside the pleading's four corners is considered, and the motion is not converted into one for summary judgment, the question becomes whether the pleader has a cause of action, not whether the pleader has stated one, and unless it has been shown that a material fact as claimed by the pleader is not a fact at all, and unless it can be said that no significant dispute exists regarding it, dismissal should not eventuate" (Matter of Clavin v… [read post]
9 Nov 2021, 1:30 pm
On 13 October 2021, the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Anwar v The Advocate General (representing the Secretary of State for Business Energy and Industrial Strategy) [2021] UKSC 44. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 8:26 am
It starts with a consideration of the Chinese state constitution. [read post]
2 Nov 2021, 10:06 am
The oral argument in Whole Woman's Health v. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 4:30 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2021, 3:02 pm
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 5:26 pm
Mitchell, credited as the devious mind behind Texas’s S.B. 8, presumably demonstrates that he knows how to correctly pronounce “Chick-fil-A”: Yesterday, the Supreme Court of Texas heard oral argument in Von Dohlen v. [read post]
29 Oct 2021, 11:06 am
Jackson and United States v. [read post]
26 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
In this post, Stephanie Cheung, Mitchell Abbott and Jana Blahova of CMS Cameron McKenna Nabarro Olswang LLP, comment on the decision handed down by the UK Supreme Court in Pakistan International Airline Corporation v Times Travel (UK) Ltd [2021] UKSC 40 and consider how the decision impacts on the doctrine of lawful economic duress. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 1:46 pm
Skepnek, of The Sader Law Firm, of Kansas City, Missouri, and Kevin Babbit, of Fagan & Emert, LLC, of Lawrence, Kansas won in State v. [read post]
13 Oct 2021, 9:08 am
Mitchell v. [read post]
