Search for: "MOTOROLA V US" Results 21 - 40 of 770
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Oct 2012, 9:19 am by Florian Mueller
The [F]RAND royalty for a license to Motorola's H.264 SEPs is 2.25% of the net selling price ('NSP') of licensed products (e.g., Microsoft's Xbox 360 or Windows OS software), based on a hypothetical negotiation between the parties considering the relevant evidence (e.g., Motorola's past licenses, the strength and value of Motorola's patents, and the use of Motorola's patents by Microsoft). [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 9:23 pm
(collectively, “Motorola”) on the contract and patent infringement claims, Memorylink Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
” In the complaint, Motorola asserts that certain communication system server software, including the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (all versions 4.0 or later) along with certain RIM products, including the BlackBerry Pearl, Curve, Bold, and Storm wireless handheld devices as well as the lithium-ion battery packs used by such devices infringe the asserted Motorola patents. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:37 pm by Florian Mueller
In U.S. federal court, it's not impossible but certainly rather difficult to satisfy the eBay v. [read post]
19 Dec 2012, 3:10 am by Florian Mueller
Yesterday the initial determination on remand came down in the Motorola v. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 12:13 am by Florian Mueller
At the end of the day, even Google's Motorola may end up having to pay.Earlier this month it became known that Nokia is now suing HTC over Google Maps as well, which is a wider IP issue that goes beyond Android.I'll probably have some more Nokia v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:17 pm by Robert Kreisman
The Illinois Appellate Court has affirmed a ruling by a Cook County associate judge who denied a forum non conveniens challenge brought by Motorola in Joseph Erwin, Jr., et al. v. [read post]