Search for: "Maine v. Superior Court" Results 161 - 180 of 1,001
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Dec 2020, 6:53 am by Yosie Saint-Cyr
In this decision, the Superior Court of Justice decided that a harsh termination clause can be struck down if it is not sufficiently brought to the attention of the employee. [read post]
12 Nov 2020, 1:25 pm by rainey Reitman
Xavier Becerra and United States of America v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 2:09 pm
  Appellant's main argument was that the award of over $47,000 in attorney's fees was improper given that the plaintiff obtained a result at trial that was less than the jurisdictional minimum of unlimited jurisdiction cases in superior court ($25,000). [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:24 am by Dan Bressler
” “Same counsel can’t work for insurer on both priority dispute and AB claim: Court” — “An Ontario auto insurer involved in a priority dispute with another insurer should have used a different counsel in that dispute than the one used for the main accident benefits claim with the insureds, the Ontario Superior Court has ruled. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 10:34 am by Steven Koprince
And that finally brings us to the current Court of Federal Claims decision, Superior Optical Labs, Inc., v. [read post]
25 Oct 2020, 8:49 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Court’s use of good faith in Churchill Falls (Labrador) Corp. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2020, 6:10 pm by Matt Cooper
Secretary of State, the Maine Supreme Court issued an opinion refusing to extend the absentee ballot receipt deadline, affirming a superior court decision. [read post]
  These startups’ well-heeled investors are one of the main points of resistance— and provided the money designed to defeat it at the ballot and in the courts. [read post]
9 Oct 2020, 9:57 am by Howard M. Wasserman
Superior Court of California, which held that selling a similar product in a state could not provide a basis for jurisdiction in that state. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 2:52 pm by Amy Howe
One provision of the constitution directs that no more than a “bare majority” of the judges on the state’s five main courts can be affiliated with any one political party. [read post]
While experts have noted that these provisions do not expressly address elections for federal office, an Arizona superior court judge ruled in the 2016 case Brakey v. [read post]