Search for: "Major v. Puckett*" Results 1 - 20 of 20
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2008, 2:04 pm
  (It would have taken the votes of five Justices, including at least one from the original majority, to grant rehearing.) [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 9:59 pm by Dwight Sullivan
He learned that there was controversy as to the natural-born-citizen status of both major political parties’ general election candidates. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
  Full disclosure – Bexis filed a brief for PLAC in Phillips on the Restatement Third issue.While three justices aren’t a majority of Pennsylvania’s seven-member Supreme Court, in Phillips they outnumbered the court’s Azzarello supporters 3-2 (there was a vacancy and an obscure concurrence in the result). [read post]
17 Nov 2006, 7:40 am
[which begins] I respectfully dissent from the majority opinion with regard to the restrictive covenant because a less restrictive interpretation should be applied in light of ambiguity within the covenant. [read post]
24 Mar 2009, 9:00 pm
Here is the essence of the majority's opinion: "Such a breach [by the prosecution]  is undoubtedly a violation of the defendant's rights, see Santobello v. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 10:15 am by CJLF Staff
Supreme Court's ruling Tuesday in the Martinez v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
Then back in 1997 came Old Chief v. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 6:11 am by Jim Sedor
The agency also approved of a second set of regulations in the form of an interim final rule responding to the ruling in McCutcheon v. [read post]