Search for: "Malcolm v. State" Results 1 - 20 of 407
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2019, 1:12 pm by Daily Record Staff
Criminal procedure — Motion to suppress evidence — Statements to police In 2014, Harold Singfield, appellant, was charged, in the Circuit Court for Washington County, with 86 criminal counts arising from four convenience store robberies, each of which occurred at a different location on a different date. [read post]
20 Dec 2011, 3:30 am by Matthew Flinn
Malcolm v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] EWCA Civ 1538 - Read Judgment The Court of Appeal has decided that a failure to provide a life sentence prisoner with a minimum of one hour in the open air each day did not constitute a breach of his human rights under Article 8 of the European Convention of Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:07 pm
At para 100 in Malcolm, Lady Justice Arden adopts the approach of Clark v Novacold Limited in employment law, by which the Court considers itself bound, and states: It follows from the example of the guide dog that it does not matter that Lewisham would have treated every tenant who sublet in the same way, even if the tenant had no disability. [read post]
23 Sep 2009, 1:36 pm
The Appeals Court explained that Malcolm Moulton challenges the district court's approval of a settlement agreement arising from a class action filed by the neighbors of a steel mill owned by United States Steel Corporation. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:01 pm
One week after a New York court struck down Rockland County's sex offender banishment law (opinion available here), State Senate Majority Leader Malcolm A. [read post]
5 Dec 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
The jurisdiction of New York State’s Division of Human Rights is limited to resolving complaints of alleged unlawful discrimination involving an employer, an employment agency, or a labor unionMalcolm v New York State Dept. of Labor, 2014 NY Slip Op 07852, Appellate Division, Fourth DepartmentBernice Malcolm filed a complaint of unlawful discrimination with the New York State Division of Human Rights in which she named the New York State… [read post]
8 Oct 2019, 4:15 am by Eileen McDermott
Justices Breyer, Kavanaugh, Ginsburg and Gorsuch and Chief Justice Roberts were among the most active questioners of Malcolm Stewart, representing the government of the United States, and Morgan Chu of Irell & Manella, representing NantKwest, during yesterday’s oral argument in Peter v. [read post]