Search for: "Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Oct 2007, 1:19 am
Donald Benjamin, Jr. and Neal Benjamin, defendants-appellants-cross-appellees NEW YORK COUNTYContractsDefendant Granted Dismissal; Plaintiff Fails to Show It Relied on Appraisal of 'Gauguin' Painting Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Sheppard Mullin
Finally, in terms of unjust enrichment, the Court referred to Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 5:15 am by Sheppard Mullin
Finally, in terms of unjust enrichment, the Court referred to Mandarin Trading Ltd. v. [read post]
13 May 2021, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
” “The motion court also properly dismissed plaintiff’s claim for unjust enrichment, which required a showing, among other things, that defendant was enriched (Mandarin Trading Ltd. v Wildenstein, 16 NY3d 173, 182 [2011]). [read post]