Search for: "Manhattan Advisers LLC"
Results 1 - 20
of 159
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2024, 4:03 am
Petrokansky to advise me what he [sic] was signing” (NYSCEF Doc No. 103, ¶ 23). [read post]
29 Apr 2024, 3:59 am
Act I: Who Controls the LLC? [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Many state and local officials host social media sites and use them to converse with followers on matters related to their governmental responsibilities, among other things.[1] Not surprisingly, many choose to block from their sites certain members of the public they find disagreeable.[2] Being disagreeable, or at least in disagreement with such actions, blocked followers sometimes sue alleging that their exclusion violates the First Amendment.[3] One of the most notable examples was a… [read post]
12 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
# # #DECISIONFAF, LLC v LIR, LLC [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:32 am
Last week, the Manhattan-based Appellate Division, First Department, handed down one of the more intriguing decisions by a New York court I’ve seen in a long time involving a dispute between LLC members. [read post]
18 Dec 2023, 7:00 am
Dolgencorp, LLC., Case No. 2:17-cv-01649-MHH) in U.S. [read post]
21 Nov 2023, 10:00 pm
’s case should have been dismissed and the spoliation request denied, as academic.That certainly didn’t work.# # #DECISIONM.V. v Sunstone Red Oak, LLC [read post]
6 Nov 2023, 7:00 am
UFP Ranson, LLC, Civil Action No. 3:21-CV-00149-GMG) in the U.S. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 4:22 am
The Court’s Decision In his decision granting Gallagher’s motion for summary judgment of liability, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice David B. [read post]
10 Jul 2023, 11:00 pm
NYC LLC [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 7:35 am
But his filing paints a picture of an insider trader’s gnawing fear as well as the close ties between Manhattan federal prosecutors and the white-collar defense bar. [read post]
25 May 2023, 11:00 pm
Victor's notice merely advised, in pertinent part, as follows: “`[t]he proposed Acquisition is required for and is in connection with a certain project … consisting of facilitating the productive reuse and redevelopment of the vacant and underutilized Proposed Site through municipal and/or economic development projects … by attracting and accommodating new tenant(s) and/or end user(s). [read post]
23 Apr 2023, 9:00 pm
Besides Clifford, identified as Penny Peterson in the NDA, the parties included Essential Consultants LLC (EC), a corporate shell created by Michael Cohen to make the 2016 payment. [read post]
13 Apr 2023, 5:17 am
Our firm is investigating potential investment fraud claims by customers of former LPL Financial LLC financial advisor John Nicholas Matson in Manhattan Beach, California. [read post]
29 Mar 2023, 6:41 am
Manhattan District Attorney Alvin Bragg is nearing what could be the first criminal indictment of a former U.S. president in history. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 9:11 am
11/02/2017 – 12/07/2022, LPL FINANCIAL LLC (CRD#:6413), MANHATTAN BEACH, CA, B, 06/22/2015 – 11/09/2017, AMERIPRISE FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 4:23 am
Group II LLC v Nabe (2022 NY Slip Op 30399[U] [Sup Ct, NY County 2022]), Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Jennifer G. [read post]
9 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
National/Federal Democrats Ramp Up Investigation of Kushner Family Business Dealings MSN – Michael Kranish (Washington Post) | Published: 12/7/2022 Democrats on a pair of congressional committees launched a new effort to obtain information about whether Jared Kushner’s actions on U.S. policy in the Persian Gulf region as a senior White House adviser were influenced by the bailout of a property owned by his family business. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 4:25 am
Two recent cases out of the Manhattan Commercial Division and the U.S. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:18 am
In JDS Fourth Avenue JV LLC v Largo 613 Baltic Street Partners LLC, decided by Manhattan Commercial Division Justice Andrew Borrok, the 51% member of a realty-holding LLC sued the 49% member alleging default on an approximate $1 million, undocumented, demand-loan obligation which, in its defense and the subject of its motion to dismiss based on documentary evidence, the 49% member contended was an equity distribution. [read post]
