Search for: "March v. Municipal Court"
Results 21 - 40
of 919
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Nov 2023, 9:56 am
The Court says that plaintiff's diagnosis of major depressive disorder occurred in March 2013, prior to the discriminatory conduct of August 2013, and was not initially related to her medical condition which gave rise to the disability discrimination claim. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 6:25 pm
The appeal was argued in that court on March 20, 2023. [read post]
13 Oct 2023, 4:00 am
From the States and Municipalities Alabama – Rep. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 7:18 am
This week the Texas Supreme Court denied the City’s petition for review. [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 4:59 pm
On August 8, 2023, in Lacy v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
22 Aug 2023, 9:00 pm
Supreme Court, Sackett v. [read post]
18 Aug 2023, 5:07 am
Johnson v Watts 2023 NY Slip Op 32825(U) August 14, 2023 Supreme Court, Kings County Docket Number: Index No. 502133/2018 Judge: Peter P. [read post]
15 Aug 2023, 12:52 pm
Sears v. [read post]
3 Aug 2023, 4:12 am
In the May 2023 case of Phumelela Local Municipality v Telkom SA SOC Limited, the validity of a founding affidavit submitted to the court in relation to an application for summary judgment was rejected for want of compliance with the commissioner of oaths regulations. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
Texas law requires that municipal contracts include a clause that the contractor will not boycott Israel. [read post]
12 Jul 2023, 11:28 am
The decision in Lucas v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 5:56 pm
District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 7:09 pm
Part V concludes with a report card on how the regime is doing on its thirtieth anniversary. [read post]
19 Jun 2023, 7:41 am
March 31, 2023). [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 10:23 am
In Haaland v. [read post]
14 Jun 2023, 8:38 am
Walgreens liability depositions taken by Mougey and Gaddy have played in every trial against Walgreens in federal and state court.New Mexico v. [read post]
31 May 2023, 6:42 am
” “‘The courts universally hold that a law firm will not be allowed to drop a client in order to resolve a direct conflict of interest, thereby turning a present client into a former client,’ MTTP argued, citing multiple court decisions such as Picker Int’l, Inc. v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 1:18 pm
” . . .In March 2015, Bryant started his treatment with LCMH as required by the court’s order. [read post]
16 May 2023, 3:35 pm
Second Circuit oral argument was held in March. [read post]
