Search for: "March v. Municipal Court"
Results 81 - 100
of 918
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Jun 2018, 3:12 pm
American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees. [read post]
22 Mar 2019, 6:27 am
Posted by Cydney Posner, Cooley LLP, on Sunday, March 17, 2019 Tags: Accountable Capitalism Act, Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 12:17 pm
Oral Argument in Klumpp v. [read post]
15 Jun 2016, 3:35 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court reiterated this holding in 2003’s State v. [read post]
15 Apr 2013, 1:13 pm
California's own supreme court heard arguments on this very issue last month, and a decision is pending in Riverside v. [read post]
17 Oct 2016, 4:00 am
Feuer v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
March 3 - 7, 2007: U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals, March 04, 2008 Mora v. [read post]
7 Apr 2016, 7:31 am
The matter is Kosmos v Leopont [2016] ZASCA 48 (31 March 2016) [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 6:55 am
The Michigan Supreme Court granted defendant-appellee’s motion for an extension to file his brief in People v Bailey. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:28 am
Or it might not.The case is Manza v. [read post]
25 Feb 2020, 11:51 am
Ken has successfully handled over one thousand Municipal Court and Superior Court matters in the past 27 years. [read post]
17 Feb 2020, 10:12 am
Ken V served as a Municipal Prosecutor and was amazed how minor criminal guilty pleas and even dismissed charges can affect someone’s ability to get a job or advance a career. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Plaintiff received benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
Plaintiff received benefits pursuant to General Municipal Law §207-c. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 8:37 am
Dismissal of the antitrust claim (2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,953) was affirmed.The March 14, 2011, decision is Active Disposal, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:25 am
”Further, said the court, in Matter of Park v Kapica, 8 NY3d 302, the Court of Appeals ruled that "[a] municipality is not permitted to recoup section 207-c payments where … the officer avails himself [or herself] of due process protections by challenging the medical examiner's determination because such a challenge cannot be equated with a refusal to return to duty. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 3:24 am
In Helmers v. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:24 pm
Dalke won in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 9:33 am
March 29, 2011). [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 1:21 pm
In March 2011, the U.S. [read post]
