Search for: "Mark A. Sales v. State of Indiana"
Results 81 - 100
of 148
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
So now, as our learned intermediary headcount post describes in detail, there is precedent following the learned intermediary rule in every state in the country – ranging from high court or statutory authority in 38 states (and DC), to a Vermont state trial court at the other extreme.Plainly, reports of the death of the learned intermediary rule have, in the words of Mark Twain, have been greatly exaggerated. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 2:55 am
Key Findings: Excessive tax rates on cigarettes in some states induce substantial black and gray market movement of tobacco products into high-tax states from low-tax states or foreign sources. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 12:42 pm
Other cases finding preemption of post-sale duty to warn claims asserting a mandatory state-law requirement to change a warning through the CBE process are: Scanlon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
” Golonka, 65 P.3d at 971-72 (citations and quotation marks omitted). [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:32 am
United States. [read post]
13 May 2013, 7:30 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 4:56 am
Applera Corp (Patently-O) (271 Patent Blog) District Court S D Indiana: Stay pending reexam lifted prior to issuance of reexam certificate (Docket Report) District Court N D Illinois: United States is not an indispensible party to false marking action: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 8:53 am
For this determination, the court referred to Read Corp. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2011, 12:42 am
A terrible joke for a serious issue that has plagued the US farming community and US courts for years – most recently in an appeal from the Southern District of Indiana to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ("CAFC") in the case of Monsanto v Bowman. [read post]
19 Sep 2010, 10:39 pm
Cozad Trailer Sales, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Egg Works left with egg on its face after court denies preliminary injunction against Egg World: Egg Works, Inc. et al v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 5:00 pm
United States without reaching the central question presented by the cert petition, which involved clarifying the rule of Marks v. [read post]
23 Sep 2021, 1:09 pm
Marks, No. 21A8 (U.S. [read post]
18 Jan 2013, 2:06 pm
In other words, because manufacturers profit from the sale of their products, it is appropriate for them to answer for injuries caused by defects in those products. [read post]
4 Aug 2021, 2:47 pm
State case: P lost a counterclaim b/c no one could find the standard; Indiana SCt discusses in 2017 difficulties in accessing a standard. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 5:30 pm
App. 1979) (citations and quotation marks omitted) (emphasis added). [read post]
18 Aug 2012, 11:03 pm
About four years ago brand owners scored a major victory in LSU v. [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:58 am
Walter Cronkite clip on Roe v. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 8:30 am
JACK “JACKSON” PADGETT, MARK NEGRETE, GEORGE L. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 2:14 am
We discussed Fields v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 5:30 pm
See GunBroker.com LLC v. [read post]
