Search for: "Mark S. Humphreys" Results 181 - 200 of 385
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2018, 7:13 am by Lasse Søndergaard Christensen
The courts further held that it had been proven that the ‘Obelix’ marks had been well-known at least since 1993 in Denmark and that the use of the name ‘Café Obelix’ was an infringement of Albert Rene’s trademark rights. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 1:43 am by Sara Parrello
While the outcome was hardly surprising (if only because Medifarm had not asked for a change of name when it first requested AIFA the authorization), TAR’s reasoning was not entirely convincing. [read post]
16 Oct 2018, 6:08 am by Cheryl Beise
The Board’s decision to sustain Frito Lay’s opposition to registration of the marks on the ground of mere descriptiveness was affirmed. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 2:38 am by Julius Stobbs
In addition, Mitsubishi’s ability to realise the economic value of the goods bearing its mark was affected. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 2:58 am by George Basharis
Further, the marks were visually dissimilar, and The Row Kitchen and Pub offered very little evidence to raise a genuine issue of material fact that the Whiskey Row mark created the likelihood of confusion (The Row, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2018, 6:06 am by Aron Laszlo
Therefore, the use of the name as an independent trade mark could not be established. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:56 am by Kai Schmidt-Hern
“Jumpys” joined Intersnack’s other salted snack products under their umbrella mark “Funny Frisch”. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 9:57 pm by David Leffler
The PMD did, therefore, not consider the evidence to be conclusive that the mark had become established on the market in Sweden at the time of Green Staplers registration and, therefore, did not accept Volvo’s claim to rights in an unregistered trademark at the time of filing of Green Stapler’s mark. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 1:29 am by Friso Onderdelinden
  According to the Dutch Court, the use of a lookalike in the commercial infringed Verstappen’s personality rights. [read post]
26 Sep 2018, 8:39 am by Julius Stobbs
This may include a filing for a unitary mark at present, to ensure that the mark is registered in time to avoid the costs of refiling if the application is still pending upon the date of withdrawal. [read post]
25 Sep 2018, 3:13 am by Julius Stobbs
Gleissner’s conduct has been scrutinised in a plethora of trade mark and domain name decisions globally. [read post]
18 Sep 2018, 5:54 am by Justin Driver
The Court heard oral arguments in Tinker only one week after Richard Nixon defeated Hubert Humphrey for the presidency. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 8:31 am by Sascha Abrar
Accordingly, the defendant’s application for customs action would constitute an unlawful obstruction of the plaintiff’s business. [read post]
13 Sep 2018, 2:09 am by Ilarion Tomarov
The claimant alleged that respondent’s use of the mark that had been developed and owned by the claimant clearly mislead the consumers as to the identity of the manufacturer, since the respondent’s website created a false impression that it was an official website of the goods dealer or manufacturer. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:25 am by Kluwer Patent Blog
” Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts of June, July and August 1) CJEU: Puma’s feline jumps high: EUIPO must take into account earlier decisions recognizing reputation of a mark invoked in an opposition by Athanasia Giannopoulou and Verena von Bomhard “By judgment of 28 June 2018 (C‑564/16 P), the CJEU rejected an appeal filed by the EUIPO. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 1:20 am by Kluwer Patent blogger
” Top 3 Kluwer Trademark Blog posts of June, July and August 1) CJEU: Puma’s feline jumps high: EUIPO must take into account earlier decisions recognizing reputation of a mark invoked in an opposition by Athanasia Giannopoulou and Verena von Bomhard “By judgment of 28 June 2018 (C‑564/16 P), the CJEU rejected an appeal filed by the EUIPO. [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 11:45 pm by Nicholas Kaster
The Board’s findings as to the DuPont factors were supported by substantial evidence, in the court’s view. [read post]