Search for: "Marks v. 3M CO" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3M v. Mohan: example of poorly executed pro se case
29 May 2012, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
Eli Lilly & Co. v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
False Marking False Marking False Marking False Marking all at up to $500 per offense
26 Feb 2010, 4:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
For instance, in Simonian v. 3M, the plaintiff asserts that the 3M patent requires a "hook portion" but that the marked 3M "Command Strips" do not include that feature. [read post]
Patently-O - http://www.patentlyo.com/patent/
Overview of the 3M Earplugs Bellwether Trials
14 Mar 2022, 9:44 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
The 12th bellwether test trial in the continuing 3M earplugs litigation gets underway today in the case of Wilkerson v. 3M Co. (7:20-cv-00035). [read post]
Lawsuit Information Center Blog - https://www.lawsuit-information-center.com/
Can Trademark Law Combat Price Gouging? 3M is Testing Theories to Protect its Brand
9 Jul 2020, 9:01 am by Stephen P. Demm
In 3M Co. v. [read post]
Hunton Retail Law Resource Blog - https://www.huntonretailindustryblog.com/
SIXTH CIRCUIT REINSTATES MONOPOLIZATION CLAIM AGAINST 3M BASED ON EXCLUSIVE DEALING CONTRACTS
6 Oct 2006, 6:00 pm
 See LePage's Inc. v. 3M, 324 F.3d 141 (3rd Cir. 2003). [read post]
Antitrust Law Blog - http://www.antitrustlawblog.com/
Delayed Enforcement Blocks Domain Name Lawsuit--Southern Grouts v. 3M
29 Sep 2008, 5:53 pm
By Eric Goldman Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co., 2008 WL 4346798 (S.D. [read post]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog - http://blog.ericgoldman.org/
11th Circuit decision on corporate domain name renewal policies and "bad faith" element of cybersquatting case
29 Jul 2009, 8:29 pm by Tom Casagrande
In Southern Grouts and Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co., No. 08-15850 (11th Cir. [read post]
Likely to be Confused - The Softer Side of IP Law - http://secondarymeaning.blogspot.com/
11th Cir.: No Bad Faith Intent to Profit in ACPA claim (and still no word as to whether the purchase of a Google AdWord is a "use in commerce")
24 Jul 2009, 8:40 am
And this case was not the case to change that, because Southern had not properly pleaded the allegation.Affirmed.Southern Grouts & Mortars, Inc. v. 3M Co., Case No. 08-15850 (11th Cir. [read post]
Florida IP - http://floridaip.blogspot.com/
Court of Appeals Finds SCOTCHGARD Does Not Infringe STONGARD
17 Jan 2007, 7:28 pm
Its unpublished decision, titled 3M Co. v. [read post]
Seattle Trademark Lawyer - http://seattletrademarklawyer.com/blog/
Wall Street Journal covers Brooks Brothers patent marking case
1 Sep 2010, 4:14 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
In New Breed of Patent Claim Bedevils Product Makers , DIONNE SEARCEY covered aspects of the false patent marking issue found in the Federal Circuit case Stauffer v. [read post]
IPBiz - http://ipbiz.blogspot.com/
Parvin Aminolroaya appointed co-lead counsel in Elmiron multidistrict litigation
25 Jan 2021, 9:39 am by Seeger Weiss LLP
“Most of the interview was talking about the impact of this Supreme Court decision, Wyeth v. [read post]
Seeger Weiss LLP Blog - https://www.seegerweiss.com/news/
From Jewelers’ Boxes to POST-IT® Notes: Making Your Brand A Horse of a Different Color
13 Feb 2012, 8:42 am by Neil Rosenbaum
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
Consumer Advertising Law Blog - http://www.consumeradvertisinglawblog.com/
Rocker Switch Actuator Configurations Lack Acquired Distinctiveness, Says TTAB
12 Feb 2021, 3:22 am
In determining whether Carling's designs enjoyed acquired distinctiveness, the Board first had to determine the degree of descriptiveness of the designs, Royal Crown Cola Co. v. [read post]
The TTABlog - http://thettablog.blogspot.com/
Guest Post: 35 USC 289—Grant of Certiorari in Samsung v Apple = The Opportunity for a Better-Crafted Standard for Awarding Total profits
12 May 2016, 6:14 pm by Jason Rantanen
One need only reflect on the fact that more than 1,000 qui tam actions for false marking were filed by opportunistic plaintiffs following the 2009 Federal Circuit decision in Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
Patently-O - http://patentlyo.com/patent
Magistrate Judge Thynge recommends against transfer of case to Northern District of California where both parties are multi-national Delaware corporations.
31 Oct 2012, 9:56 am by James L. Higgins
” Id. at 12-13 (citing Ivoclar Vivident AG v. 3M Co., No. 11-1183-GMS-SRF (D. [read post]
Delaware IP Law Blog - http://www.delawareiplaw.com/
Computer and Internet Weekly Updates for 2015-09-26
27 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD., granting injunction https://t.co/6njNVOYQ7X -> VCC appeals trademark case ruling involving use of trade marks as keywords http://t.co/xpRxzHHKqn -> "Happy Birthday" Copyright Ruled to Be Invalid http://t.co/0AGmk6u5W9 -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-22 http://t.co/uKVWsRu27R -> Computer and Internet Updates for 2015-09-22: Web-block injunctions top 500 in Europe, according to MPA http:/…… [read post]
Copyright, Intellectual Property, Computer, Internet, e-Commerce Law - http://www.barrysookman.com
Opportunistic Bad Faith
12 Mar 2010, 2:21 am by gmlevine
 The Panel cites as precedent 3M Co. v. [read post]
Domain Name Jurisprudence & Commentaries on UDRP Cases - http://udrpcommentaries.wordpress.com
FTC v Amgen: The Economics of Bundled Discounts, Part Two
9 Jun 2023, 8:36 am by Ashwin Varma
Mark Ramseyer, & John S. [read post]
Truth on the Market - http://truthonthemarket.com/
Headcount II: The Learned Intermediary Rule And Medical Devices
10 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
App. 1986).Louisiana: Marks v. [read post]
Drug and Device Law - http://druganddevicelaw.blogspot.com/
Color May be Protected as a Trademark If It Is Not Functional
27 Aug 2012, 9:35 am by Brian A. Hall
See Qualitex Co. v. [read post]
UnIntellectual Property - http://unintellectualproperty.com/