Search for: "Marks v. Goodding"
Results 221 - 240
of 12,110
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Mar 2022, 2:46 am
The marks were registered in 1996 for goods in classes 1 to 9 as well as 11 and 34 of the Nice classification. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:41 pm
— (2009) and Arizona v. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:47 am
See Textron Inc. v. [read post]
26 Apr 2014, 3:54 am
The court found that in order for an applicant to have a bona fide claim to proprietorship, it must intend to use the mark in respect of its own goods. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 3:14 am
In Kohler Co. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 11:52 am
Forest Group, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2015, 10:49 am
Last week Advocate General Mengozzi gave his Opinion in Case C-20/14 BGW Marketing - & Management- Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz [available so far in 17 EU official languages, but not English, notes Merpel] on the interpretation of Article 4(1)(b) of Directive 2008/95, following a request by the Bundespatentgericht (German Federal Patent Court) to the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) for a preliminary ruling.The underlying dispute concerned an… [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 5:52 pm
I learned two things from the episode: (a) it’s difficult to challenge a long-standing but unused mark, and (b) if you don’t want to be found, the hills in northern Greenville (South Carolina) county are a good hiding place. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 3:01 am
McDonald’s Corporation v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 4:14 am
Consejo Regulador del Tequila, A.C. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 5:57 am
If the bird is represented in many different forms, and Liverpool's registration covers it in respect of uses of similar marks as well as the identical mark, it is bound to tread on the toes of other legitimate users or inhibit their own brand extension activities, but if protection is not granted against the unauthorised use of similar marks it probably won't be much good. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 9:00 am
We have a nice student post today on the motion filed by Mark Cuban for attorneys fees against the Commission alleging bad faith in connection with the investigation. [read post]
12 Dec 2023, 3:11 am
The Wet Seal, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 3:08 am
Dutch Bros., LLC v. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 2:11 pm
In Clearline Technologies, Ltd. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
Under s 41 of the Trademarks Act 1995 (Cth), an application for registering the registration of a trade mark must be rejected if the trade mark is not capable of distinguishing the applicant’s goods or services in respect of which the trade mark is sought to be registered from the goods and services of other persons. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:34 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch) (IPKat post here), the English Court of Appeal examined in detail the nature and role of survey evidence. [read post]
13 Aug 2019, 2:51 am
"Although applicant's mark contains a prominent design element, it is the verbal portion of the mark that is most likely to indicate the origin of the goods. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:17 am
Belmora LLC v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 3:23 am
Barclays Capital Inc. and Barclays PLC v. [read post]
