Search for: "Mars, Incorporated v. Standard Brands, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 21
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 2:41 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc. [read post]
15 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm
It is sold by Goreunder the brand name “Gore-Tex. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 7:55 pm
, promulgates TSI's affidavit template as a new standard to supplement the model BRA in the Texas Rules of Evidence. [read post]
21 Mar 2014, 8:43 am
Varsity Brands, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 10:41 am
Wilson, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 4:56 am
Shure, Inc (GRAY on Claims) (Patently-O) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC on relative claim terminology: Power-One, Inc v Artesyn Technologies, Inc (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (EDTexweblog.com) CAFC: Panel disagrees regarding use of incorporation by reference to identify structure for means-plus-function claims: Pressure Products Medical Supplies, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 2:27 pm
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of separability analysis, by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 11:50 am
Varsity Brands, Inc., (“Star Athletica”), expanded the scope of the separability analysis by affirming the Sixth Circuit decision that the design features incorporated in a useful article, such as the cheerleading costumes in the case, are protected under the Copyright Act when they can be separated from, and are capable of existing independently of, the design’s utilitarian aspects.[13] Following the Star Athletica precedent, the “separability… [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Camco Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Camco Inc. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 12:09 pm
Internet users who follow a celebrity also follow a brand—making the celebrity fan four times more likely to follow a brand than the average U.S. adult online.7 In addition, the study found that those fans were more likely to offer advice and share opinions with fellow online consumers, particularly in the case of entertainment subjects. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:08 pm
Instruments, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:45 am
Holdings, Inc. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
– Need for business and government to understand role of IP (IPEG) Global - Trade Marks / Brands New record for international trade mark registrations in 2008 but signs of slowdown at year end and possible negative annual income (WIPO) (IP Frontline) (Intellectual Property Watch) (Law360) Coca-Cola is no longer the world’s most valuable brand (IAM) WTO session tackles details of future register of GI products (Intellectual Property Watch) Can a house… [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:04 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: Court reconsidering baseless ‘making available’ theory in file-sharing case Capitol Records v Jammie Thomas; amicus briefs from, MPAA, PFF: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Electronic Fontier Foundation), (Techdirt), (Ars Technica), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Patry Copyright Blog) ICANN approves rules allowing brands… [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:04 pm
In Genesco, Inc. v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 8:04 pm
In Genesco, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 12:50 am
” Importantly, the ANPR also suggests that the rule could do more than just change the FTC’s enforcement tools and also seek to substantively change the standard that has long been applied in analyzing earnings and lifestyle claims. [read post]
