Search for: "Marshall v. Peter"
Results 41 - 60
of 283
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2021, 9:30 pm
As Chief Justice Marshall explained in Bank of the United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 9:30 pm
A notice of The Great Dissenter: The Story of John Marshall Harlan, America’s Judicial Hero, by Peter S. [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
23 Jun 2021, 2:46 pm
As the postal case was wending its way through the courts in 2020, four experts in the reliability of software-based systems—Peter Ladkin, Bev Littlewood, Harold Thimbleby and Martyn Thomas— wrote of the case, "[F]or any moderately complex software-based computer system, such as the IT transaction-processing system Horizon ... it is a practical impossibility to develop such a system so that the correctness of every software operation is provable to the relevant standard in… [read post]
18 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
Tanick on Near v. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 12:22 pm
• Roger V. [read post]
8 Jun 2021, 4:30 pm
” And online at The Christian Science Monitor, Seth Stern has a review of the book headlined “The US Supreme Court’s ‘Great Dissenter’ repudiated ‘separate but equal’; Justice John Marshall Harlan’s dissents, like the one in Plessy v. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:30 pm
Simon & Schuster has published The Great Dissenter: The Story of John Marshall Harlan, America's Judicial Hero, by Peter S. [read post]
18 May 2021, 7:21 am
Justice Harlan's dissent in Plessy v. [read post]
7 May 2021, 9:30 pm
" (Senate Progressives v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 1:53 pm
Crump, 376 N.C. at 392, quoting Peter A. [read post]
7 Apr 2021, 12:23 pm
• Peter De Rose, 73, of Austin, died January 21, 2021. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 1:43 am
In Ericsson v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 11:53 am
Frank Bowman recently published an essay in Lawfare that criticized arguments I made in an essay on the site. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 4:53 pm
On the same day, judgment was handed down in the case of Tinkler v Ferguson [2021] EWCA Civ 18 (heard 16 December 2020 by Peter Jackson and Dingemans LJJ and Sir Richard McCombe). [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 5:01 am
The Supreme Court so held in United States v. [read post]
11 Sep 2020, 12:30 am
At Pizza Limited | Rat Pack / RatPac – Not All Trade Mark Judges are Movie Producers | UK patent exams update: Major changes to invigilation arrangements for candidates taking the exams in the office | UK patent exams update: Final version of FAQs released | When free-riding someone else's brand might be a win-win situation | [Guestpost]: IP implications of 3D printing, a new studyNever Too Late 279 [Week ending August 23] No CJEU reference (yet) as Mannheim… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:52 am
In Rat Pack v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
Deanne Maynard, co-chair of Morrison & Foerster’s Appellate and Supreme Court practice, has argued 14 cases before the Supreme Court since her first oral argument in 2004. [read post]
