Search for: "Martin v. Berg et al"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2007, 4:57 am
OCs (Estimated Relative Risk or Odds Ratio with 95% CI) Bloemenkamp et al,[8]1995 Case-Control 2.2 (0.9-5.4) Spitzer (Transnational),[9] 1996 Case-Control 1.5 (1.1-2.2) Bloemankamp et al,[13] 1999 Case-Control 1.9 (0.8-4.5) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[14] 2000 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9 (1.3-2.8)/2.3 (1.3-3.9) Farley et al (WHO),[6] 1995 Case-Control 2.4 (1.3-4.6) Jick et al (UK-GPRD),[7] 1995 Cohort/Case-Control 1.9… [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 4:06 pm
Berg, R. [read post]
4 Apr 2009, 6:26 pm
Berg, R. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:04 pm
[et al.]. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Aug. 21, 1998) (citing Daubert II, “‘[d]oubling of the risk’ is the legal standard for evaluating the sufficiency of the plaintiffs’ evidence and for determining which claims should be heard by the jury”), rev’d, 292 F.3d 1124, 1136-37 (9th Cir. 2002) In re Berg Litig., 293 F.3d 1127 (9th Cir. 2002) (companion case to Hanford Nuclear Reservation) Cano v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
30 Aug 2008, 11:57 pm
Oliver et al (2008) published a comprehensive review of developments and future outlooks for pre-harvest food safety this month. [read post]
