Search for: "Martin v. Jones et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 42
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2024, 11:33 am
Nonetheless, Judge Jones, in his published decision, clearly rejected all the plaintiffs’ witnesses and affiants, including Egilman, in their efforts to make a case for silicone as a cause of autoimmune disease. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:42 pm
Hittle, et al. [read post]
8 Mar 2021, 4:17 pm
AIALA, Appellant, v. [read post]
15 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm
Jay J then heard an application in the case of Wright v Granath before Jay J. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 6:03 am
LaFave, et al., Criminal Procedure § 19.2(e) (4th ed. 2015). [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 7:18 am
Plaintiffs’ counsel, Dickie Scruggs, et al., withdrew her before the defense could conduct an examination before trial. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 10:45 am
[…]” (emphasis added)The Superior Court of Los Angeles County held (BC667011) that, because Feud tried to portray de Havilland as realistically as possible, it was not ‘transformative’ and therefore not eligible for protection under the First Amendment to the US Constitution.The decision was appealed to Court of Appeal of the State of California - Second Appellate District, which yesterday decidedto reverse the lower court’s order [the case is Olivia de Havilland… [read post]
5 Aug 2017, 11:50 am
Link to opinion here.Ashraf Mahmoud, et al v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 6:15 pm
Matsuda, Mari J. et al., Words That Wound (1993). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
In 1982, the Supreme Court again addressed and advanced solicitor-client privilege in Descôteaux et al. v. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 5:21 am
Cooper, et al. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am
., citing Ofer Shpilberg, et al., The Next Stage: Molecular Epidemiology, 50 J. [read post]
12 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
By Melanie Martin-Jones and Jim Liles Early in December 2014, the U.S. [read post]
26 Jul 2014, 10:00 pm
Martin Luther King, Jr. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 5:29 am
Wheelahan v. [read post]
31 Jul 2012, 2:02 am
Further Reading: Martin Redish, et al., Cy Pres Relief & the Pathologies of the Modern Class Action: A Normative & Empirical Analysis, 62 Fla. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 5:36 pm
Minn. 2008)(noting that some but not all courts have concluded relative risks under two support finding expert witness’s opinion to be inadmissible) XYZ, et al. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 5:26 am
Martin, et al. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 9:23 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 11:49 am
[ET AL.] [read post]
