Search for: "Martin v. State of Kan." Results 61 - 75 of 75
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2023, 4:44 am by admin
  To be sure, there are gaps, inconsistencies, and mistakes, but the statistics chapter should be a must-read for federal (and state) judges. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 8:24 am by Schachtman
Mass. 1997)(occupational epidemiology of benzene exposure and benzene does not inform health effects from vanishingly low exposure to benzene in bottled water) Whiting v. [read post]
25 Apr 2015, 11:03 am by Schachtman
Third, the Manual authors state that the doubling argument assumes the “[n]onacceleration of disease. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 11:42 pm
He stated that it wasn't bad as he had expected, given the war-time circumstances: "We have 75 students, and we haven't had to admit any women. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Click Here Spirit AeroSystems, Inc., of Wichita, Kan., to Pay $132,500 Civil Penalty to Settle Issues Involving Hazardous Waste Management. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm by Bexis
 At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 11:15 am by Steven M. Taber
Respondents failed to provide EPA with the required notice, although the State of Rhode Island was notified. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
 Stoutjesdyk Dairy LLC, 3265 460th Street, Maurice, Iowa, did not have a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit at the time of an April 2009 inspection by EPA Region 7, according to a consent agreement and final order filed today in Kansas City, Kan. [read post]