Search for: "Martinez v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2024, 7:27 am
Bronx Native composed of Giancarlos Martinez, Roselyn Grullon and Amaurys Grullon, Cancellation No. 92077944 (February 7, 2024) [Not precedential] (Opinion by Judge Thomas L. [read post]
5 Oct 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
(b)(1) ["[c]onstitutionally protected activity is not included within the meaning of 'course of conduct'"]; see Thomas v. [read post]
29 Aug 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
In Regents of Univ. of California v. [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 9:05 pm by Victoria Hawekotte
Justice Clarence Thomas, however, argued in his concurrence that the Court should reconsider longstanding substantive due process rulings, including Griswold v. [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 6:50 pm by Ronald Mann
ShareWednesday’s argument in Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts v. [read post]
12 Oct 2022, 4:32 pm by Mark Walsh
Justice Clarence Thomas tries to ask Martinez a question about transforming Warhol’s “Orange Prince” image into a “Go Orange” message in support of Syracuse University. [read post]
23 Sep 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
Spending in election cycles by corporations and the ultrawealthy through so-called dark money groups has skyrocketed since the 2010 Supreme Court decision Citizens United v. [read post]
5 Aug 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
National/Federal A Right-Wing Think Tank Claimed to Be a Church. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 10:03 pm by Josh Blackman
Third, Justice Thomas wrote the majority opinion in Kemp v. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 7:01 am by Howard Bashman
And Justice Thomas delivered the opinion of the Court in Kemp v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 4:30 am by Eric Segall
" Posner also noted the irony of Scalia's and Thomas's "pro-life" positions on abortion and their pro-death positions on the state executing an innocent person.Well, last week the Roberts/Trump Court voted six-three in Shinn v. [read post]