Search for: "Marvel v. State"
Results 101 - 120
of 478
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2021, 9:04 am
My thanks to the editors for putting together a marvelous collection of essays about which I will have more to say in a later post. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 2:54 pm
The Court heard nine cases during the March session when Michigan v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 2:55 am
[Smith v. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:56 am
Below are pictures of her library display, along with her descriptions of two individual sections.Robb FarmerUsing Comics and Graphic Literature to Illustrate Legal Concepts"Ownership Rights – shows the Captain Marvel and Superman copyright battle in National Comics Publications v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:03 am
United States, No. 11-5350 (D.C. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 6:09 am
If Baker v. [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 5:35 am
But another case soon to be (re)argued before the Court, Kiobel v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 3:20 pm
United States, 370 U.S. 294, 325 (1962)). [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 10:16 am
Horne v. [read post]
11 Feb 2007, 2:34 am
Further to global warming (and Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 8:44 am
Wildcat Intellectual Property Holdings, LLC v. 4Kids Entertainment, Inc. et alU.S. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:22 am
The reason for the increased difficulty in proving willfulness is illustrated in Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 10:22 am
The reason for the increased difficulty in proving willfulness is illustrated in Carnegie Mellon University v. [read post]
5 May 2008, 2:34 am
I am aware of one recent case, Greer-Burger v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 11:19 am
We're making an exception for today's decision in Gazal v. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 1:10 pm
Walden v. [read post]
22 Oct 2009, 6:30 am
Ah, the marvels of technology. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 11:20 am
We agreed that the brioche bun was a marvel, while the patty was just so-so. [read post]
23 Dec 2016, 2:11 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 9:00 am
The legal ground here is, at best, unsteady.An interesting precedent exists, however, in Janky v. [read post]