Search for: "Maryland v. Railroad Company" Results 21 - 40 of 48
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Jan 2014, 7:11 am by John Elwood
Cobb, 13-138; Sears, Roebuck and Company v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 12:54 pm by Amy Howe
United States: Whether stock that a railroad transfers to its employees is taxable under the Railroad Retirement Tax Act. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 12:32 pm by John Elwood
Evidently, the petitioner in Mallory (a railroad worker who wants to sue his employer in Pennsylvania) was successful in arguing that his case is a better vehicle for addressing the issue than Cooper Tire & Rubber Company v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 11:57 am
  The Second Circuit held – in the context of asbestos mass tort litigation – that a company with “continuous and systematic” business in a state (Connecticut) can’t be sued by out-of-state litigation tourist plaintiffs over out-of-state asbestos exposure. [read post]
24 Sep 2010, 3:08 pm by Anna Christensen
Missouri Pacific Railroad Co.Docket: 09-1255Issue(s): Whether the federally funded addition of a component of a warning device (retroreflective tape) to an existing warning device (a crossbuck warning sign) at a railroad crossing is the installation of a “warning device” under 23 C.F.R. [read post]
8 Apr 2021, 3:56 pm by Pennsylvania Employment Lawyer
 Covid-19 Pandemic Class Action Lawsuit Statistics - Wage and Hour Class Actions Most Common Covid Case of The Week - Wage and Hour Claims Added to Retaliation Claim - Aguayo v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 1:19 pm
Dow Jones & Company, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2014, 10:06 am by Schachtman
See also “Maryland Refuses Apportionment in Asbestos Lung Cancer Cases – Carter” (Sept. 19, 2014); “Further Thoughts on the Carter Apportionment Case – The Pennsylvania Experience” (Sept. 20, 2014). [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 3:53 pm
” The  ”Erie doctrine”  takes its name from  Erie Railroad v. [read post]