Search for: "Maryland v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 3,215
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Oct 2010, 10:02 am by Lawrence Solum
Those who lived in the United States in 1792 surely had views on such mat- ters. [read post]
4 May 2009, 8:28 am
Maryland has amended its antitrust law to make resale price maintenance agreements per se illegal, thus overruling Leegin Creative Leather Products v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:10 am by Schachtman
Last week, the Maryland Court of Special Appeals reversed a plaintiffs’ verdict in Dixon v. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 11:28 am by Ronald V. Miller, Jr.
Prior to the 2012 amendment to Maryland Rule 3-805 (the e-mail harassment statute), each e-mail sent was the unit of prosecution used in charging the defendant. [read post]
16 May 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Maryland, 4 Wheat. 316 (1819), the Supreme Court famously invoked the Constitution’s Supremacy Clause to invalidate Maryland’s effort to levy a tax on the Bank of the United States. [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 9:27 am
A Towson, Maryland rehabilitation center has been sued by the United States Department of Labor for allegedly mishandling employees' retirement contributions. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 4:27 am by Lawrence Solum
Maryland, that nationally chartered banks are federal instrumentalities entitled to regulate themselves free from state law, even when national law fails to address the risks that state law seeks to regulate. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 7:24 am
”  The purpose of this provision is to avoid pleading in the alternative if a Court decides during the trial that the information is not a trade secret.This provision, adopted by other states from the Uniform Trade Secrets Act (USTA), has divided courts across the United States into three camps, although Maryland has not examined it in detail. [read post]
24 May 2010, 12:54 pm
Last week the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Graham v, Florida, in what amounted to the most significant case concerning juvenile sentencing since it ruled that juvenile offenders could not face capital punishment. [read post]
28 May 2014, 6:49 am by Wells Bennett
Down at Guantanamo, pre-trial proceedings will resume this morning in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 6:18 am by Wells Bennett
Today marks the first in a week-long hearing in the military commission case of United States v. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 3:00 am by Ted Folkman
Maoz, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in New York, sold franchises for “quick-service” vegetarian restaurants in the United States. [read post]