Search for: "Matter of Allen v Shields" Results 1 - 20 of 55
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 8:32 am
In addition, under the Baltimore Housing Code, an individual member of an LLC that owns a residential property may be subject to personal liability for violations of the Code as an "owner", as the term is defined, if he has "control" over the title, notwithstanding the liability shield of the LLC.Facts: An LLC acquired a property in Baltimore City in order to sell it and turn a profit. [read post]
10 Apr 2017, 8:18 am
This GuestKat had a fascinating Thursday evening attending AIPPI's rapid response seminar on the Fujifilm v AbbVie case ([2017] EWHC 395 (Pat)) at Allen & Overy's offices in Spitalfields. [read post]
23 May 2013, 2:11 pm by Bob Lawless
A few weeks ago, the Supreme Court denied cert in a case called Law Debenture Trust Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 11:03 pm
Yesterday's Eleventh Circuit majority Opinionpresents a novel theory, far from settled, that effectively will be shielded from review should theexecution proceed tomorrow. [read post]
11 Mar 2013, 11:24 am
 The IPKat's 10th Birthday Seminar on Wednesday 12 June now has over 280 registrants and the venue -- the lovely auditorium in the AmeriKat's London office of Allen & Overy LLP -- only holds 310. [read post]
27 May 2012, 8:23 am by Charon QC
  Solicitor and New Statesman columnist David Allen Green on his Jack of Kent blog has a most interesting, albeit brief,  analysis of the ‘Matter of Jeremy Hunt MP’ (my highlighting): Hunt is almost over. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 6:48 am by Schachtman
Dalkon Shield Claimants Trust, 156 F.3d 248, 253 (1st Cir.1998). [read post]
30 Dec 2020, 11:32 am by Eugene Volokh
[The judge had earlier ordered search engines and web sites to remove materials about a employment discrimination lawsuit] From Monday's order in Allen v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 5:00 am by Bexis
  As a preliminary matter, the plaintiff conceded that her failure-to-warn claims failed under Mensing. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 1:15 pm by Bexis
”  (A bit of background – in Grundberg the Utah Supreme Court concluded as a matter of law that Restatement (2d) §402A, comment k applied “across the board” and barred assertion of any and all strict liability, design defect claims). [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
 The warning in Gaston was adequate as a matter of law. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
Privacy Shield Director Alex Greenstein, are on the “home stretch. [read post]