Search for: "Matter of Allstate Ins. Co. v Marke" Results 1 - 20 of 32
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jul 2012, 7:14 am
Co. v Beau Rivage Rest., 121 AD2d 98, 101 [1986] [internal quotation marks omitted]). [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 6:24 am
Co. v Stein, 1 NY3d 416, 421 [2004] [internal quotation marks and citation omitted]). [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:22 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney holding funds in escrow owes a fiduciary duty to anyone with a beneficial interest in the trust” (Baquerizo v Monasterio, 90 AD3d 587, 587 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Levit v Allstate Ins. [read post]
27 Aug 2023, 3:56 pm by Andrew Warren
In fact, such conduct is strictly forbidden for federal officials under the Hatch Act and as a matter of Justice Department policy. [read post]
16 Nov 2022, 4:47 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
“An attorney holding funds in escrow owes a fiduciary duty to anyone with a beneficial interest in the trust” (Baquerizo v Monasterio, 90 AD3d 587, 587 [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Levit v Allstate Ins. [read post]