Search for: "Matter of Antcliff" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2012, 8:56 am by Todd Mintz
It made the front page of Digg (back when it mattered) and was hugely successful. [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 51.016 (in matters subject to the FAA, an appeal is available only under the same circumstances that an appeal from federal district court's order would be permitted). [read post]
3 Jan 2013, 7:24 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
§ 51.016 (in matters subject to the FAA, an appeal is available only under the same circumstances that an appeal from federal district court's order would be permitted). [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
I acknowledge that I am knowingly and voluntarily waiving the right to purse [sic] any such controversy, claim, or dispute against Zanios in any court or administrative forum and instead will pursue them through arbitration.I understand that if I decide to submit any dispute to arbitration in accordance with this Arbitration Policy Statement, I must submit a written request for arbitration to Zanios's President within one (1) month from the date of the incident in question, and I must respond within… [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 11:57 pm by WOLFGANG DEMINO
I understand that if I decide to submit any dispute to arbitration in accordance with this Arbitration Policy Statement, I must submit a written request for arbitration to Zanios's President within one (1) month from the date of the incident in question, and I must respond within ten (10) calendar days to each communication regarding the selection of an arbitrator, the scheduling of an arbitration hearing, or any other matters related to the arbitration proceeding. [read post]
20 May 2019, 9:18 am by Schachtman
The facts of silica cases, for example, are radically different from early exposure asbestos cases because of the wide diffusion and general equality of knowledge of silica hazards throughout industry, labor, and government.[7]  The dangers of occupational exposure to crystalline silica were so well known that the New York Court of Appeals recognized, seventy years ago, that “[i]t is a matter of common knowledge that it is injurious to the lungs and dangerous to health to work in… [read post]