Search for: "Matter of Augenstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 40
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2019, 3:11 am
Kluwer Patent blogger‘Why Berlin can’t wait for Brexit in matters of UPC’, is the title of a recent article on the website of the German law firm Kather Augenstein. [read post]
14 Sep 2022, 4:45 am
Augenstein raised very valid questions:"On Apple's website we can see how much security matters to Apple. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 7:44 am
However, IP matters are also part of other legal acts existing in the legal system. [read post]
30 Nov 2022, 6:36 am
"Ericsson was successfully defended by the Dusseldorf-based law firm of Kather Augenstein. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 4:30 am
It does not take evidence or hear technical experts for that matter. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:51 pm
It is a mystery for many reasons why Freshfields is listed only in tier 2.Hogan is on the losing track against Ericsson (represented by Kather Augenstein) in two Munich cases (1, 2). [read post]
14 Jan 2024, 9:53 am
The EPO’s Boards of Appeal are famously strict on added matter. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 7:17 am
We await the judgment of the UPC on this matter. [read post]
25 Apr 2018, 1:20 am
The AmeriKat's friend, Christopher Weber (Kather Augenstein) reports on a very different view of the role of proportionality in Germany when granting an injunction. [read post]
15 Jan 2024, 3:16 am
As readers will be well aware, one of the preferred hobbies of the Court of Justice of the European Union (“CJEU”) is to issue controversial judgments in intellectual property matters which, quite often, instead of providing guidance to national courts, raise more questions than they answer. [read post]
28 Feb 2024, 2:07 am
Such restrictions sought to limit the provisions of the Brazilian Patent Statute which guarantee the “full devolutive effect” or the ability of Appellate Bodies to decide matters raised by the appellant during the appeal stage. [read post]
20 May 2024, 4:30 am
Companies innovating in the Metaverse seek patent protection for two main types of subject matter: hardware components and software processes. [read post]
8 Dec 2023, 5:35 am
This judgment addressed the question whether artificial neural networks (ANNs) are excluded subject matter under the ‘program for a computer’ exclusion of section 1(2)(c) of the UK Patents Act 1977. [read post]
18 Mar 2022, 2:02 am
Never once has an exhaustion defense centered around that particular agreement succeeded, no matter the jurisdiction.More than ten years ago I personally attended a preliminary-injunction hearing in Paris where Samsung was denied a PI because of a patent exhaustion defense by Apple involving Qualcomm chipsets. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 6:00 am
So although there were two Sunrise Sessions at Fordham that struck her fancy (especially the data mining session), she left the reporting to her German pal Christopher Weber (Kather Augenstein). [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 1:54 am
To participate in this fast-track examination, the applicant must pay a specific fee and submit a request indicating which green technology their subject matter refers to with reference to a list of pre-defined technologies. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
The global ramifications for the patent licensing industry are huge:Patent holders who enter(ed) into agreements with chipset makers and other suppliers while hoping to reserve the enforcement of their rights against downstream customers--particularly for the purpose of collecting royalties from end-product makers--can no longer rely on a covenant to sue last (sometimes also called covenant to exhaust remedies) as a means of sidestepping patent exhaustion.I'm grateful to German IP litigator… [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 1:23 am
Furthermore there is no risk of conflicting decisions because PI applications and revocation actions do not share the same subject matter. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 1:36 am
So, as mentioned above, it is a matter for celebration that plausibility has been consigned to history. [read post]
12 Mar 2024, 3:30 pm
TBA 3.3.02 interpreted this as follows: i) means that the purported technical effect together with the claimed subject-matter need only be conceptually comprised by the broadest technical teaching of the application as filed – no literal disclosure of the effect is required, it is enough that the skilled person recognises the effect is necessarily relevant to the claimed subject matter (reason 11.10); ii) requires asking: would the skilled person, having the common general… [read post]
