Search for: "Matter of Brown v Houses" Results 1 - 20 of 936
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2017, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Brown v Bower [2017] EWHC 2637, the High Court considered the proper application of the repetition rule in determining the meaning of a statement about an MP in a book about the Blair government. [read post]
18 Feb 2020, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Ferguson’s “separate but equal” principle — even after the judiciary announced the opposing mandate of Brown v. [read post]
15 Sep 2019, 3:12 pm by Giles Peaker
Brown v Tyndale (2019) QBD (Robert Francis QC) 25/07/2019 (unreported, but note of extempore judgment on lawtel) The kind of thing that happens when neither party is represented… In December 2018, Mr Brown had obtained an ex parte injunction against Mr Tyndale, the landlord, on the basis that the landlord had attempted to lock him out of the property and remove his possessions. [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:42 am by Kent Scheidegger
A narrowly divided Supreme Court today upheld the massive prisoner release order in Brown v. [read post]
29 May 2010, 4:18 am by INFORRM
In the UK judgment in Campbell v MGN – the seminal case that effectively launched privacy actions in the UK – the publishers at Mirror Group Newspapers may ultimately have gone down in the House of Lords on a 3:2 majority, but there was no question that they could possibly ‘go down’ in the criminal sense. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 12:50 pm by Jonathan Zasloff
When the United States Supreme Court issued Brown v Board of Education, southern states engaged in Massive Resistance against it. [read post]
31 May 2010, 10:10 pm by INFORRM
While those matters might appear entirely anodyne and not worthy of protection to judges in the UK, they are protected in France. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:14 am by Hugh Tomlinson QC, Matrix Law
   This is only the second time that the highest court has considered the application of the “responsible publication in the public interest”, first established by the House of Lords in Reynolds v Times Newspapers ([2001] 2 AC 127) nearly 12 years ago. [read post]