Search for: "Matter of Brown v Stanford"
Results 81 - 100
of 108
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
As with all matters of judicial interpretation, there are matters of nuance and construction. [read post]
27 Oct 2019, 5:08 pm
DLA Piper Privacy Matters had a post “Germany: data protection authorities issue GDPR fining guidelines”. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 7:00 am
Session 5: The Content Collection Controversy Moderator: Bobby Chesney (UT) Participants: Timothy Edgar (Brown University), Jennifer Granick (Stanford University) The metadata session was followed by a session that focused exclusively on content-collection. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 2:39 pm
The other two witnesses were Professor Dan Burk (UC Irvine) and Andrew Pincus (Mayer Brown, representing BSA). [read post]
1 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
As the Court put it four years ago in Fisher v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 6:52 am
An Epitome of Great Legal Classics
1 v. (1915) Hughes, William Taylor
Office of Constable: Comprising the Laws Relating to High, Petty, and Special Constables, Headboroughs, Tithingmen, Borsholders, and Watchmen, with an Account of Their Institution and Appointment
1 v. (1840) Willcock, John William
On Conveyancers' Evidence
1 v. (1839) Coventry, Thomas
On the Admissibility of Confessions and… [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
Our Working Group’s members may write to the Commission separately on whether, as a matter of policy, the proposal should be adopted or modified; those matters are beyond the scope of these comments. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 12:39 pm
Instead, again, they cite to Brown Shoe Co. v. [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 7:00 pm
(Patent Prospector) US-Korea adopt patent prosecution highway (Law360) (Patent Docs) (Managing Intellectual Property) Global Global - General Obama, patent reform, patent litigation in the USA and Europe – IP Think Tank podcast 26 January 2009 (IP Think Tank) Intangible values collapse – the old 70% to 80% claim is now officially dead and buried (IAM) (IP Asset Maximizer Blog) Managing value in a shrinking economy: the IP audit (IP Frontline) Downturn… [read post]
25 Nov 2019, 6:00 am
In Brown v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
4 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
This post was prepared for a roundtable on Wrestling with Religious Diversity, convened as part of LevinsonFest 2022—a year-long series gathering scholars from diverse disciplines and viewpoints to reflect on Sandy Levinson’s influential work in constitutional law. [read post]
3 Feb 2022, 1:23 pm
Circuit Judge Janice Rogers Brown. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am
10 Myths and Facts About Workers' Compensation Posted by LexisNexis Workers' Comp Law Community Staff The LexisNexis Workers’ Compensation Law Community and the award-winning blog Work Comp Roundup have teamed up to present some common myths and facts about workers’ compensation. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am
Or they may consciously adopt the role of “public intellectuals,” where the key datum is the receptivity of reporters or the editors of op-ed pages to solicit their views about pressing matters of the day. [read post]
17 Jul 2017, 4:44 pm
” (Cleveland National Forest Foundation, et al v. [read post]
26 Jan 2022, 9:46 am
Van Orden v. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 6:00 pm
: (IPRoo), Giving Goliath the slingshot: Review of the National Innovation System on 'the costs of enforcing IP rights': (Australia & New Zealand Intellectual Property Law), Take patent policy away from lawyers, says Australian government report: (IAM), Advisory Council announces review of scope of patentable subject matter: (International Law Office), Federal Court's flu shot for patent law: Notice to Practitioners - Proceedings under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth):… [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
As I explain in my book at greater length, Chief Justice Salmon Chase dissented from the Supreme Court’s decision in Bradwell v Illinois (1873), which upheld the discrimination against women in licensing lawyers. [read post]
22 Feb 2024, 2:04 pm
& Pol'y Rev. 53, 66 & n.49, 98 & n.207 (1999); see also Timothy Farrar, Manual of the Constitution of the United States of America 436 (Boston, Little, Brown, & Co. 3d ed. rev. 1872) ("The general power of impeachment and trial may extend to others besides civil officers, as military or naval officers, or even persons not in office, and to other offences than those expressly requiring a judgment of removal from office . . . . [read post]
