Search for: "Matter of City of Schenectady"
Results 1 - 20
of 77
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 12:45 pm
Schenectady challenged the Appellate Division ruling and appealed the matter to the Court of Appeals. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:21 am
Procedural issues concerning the arbitrability of a grievance is for the arbitrator to resolveMatter of Board of Educ. of Schenectady City School Dist. v Schenectady Fedn. of Teachers, 61 AD3d 1175The collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Schenectady City School District and the Schenectady Federation of Teachers provided that "[a]ll teachers may be required to attend no more than three (3) evening meetings a year. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:53 am
This was not the case in the Matter of the Arbitration between the Schenectady Federation of Teachers and the Schenectady City School District. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:10 am
Procedural issues concerning the arbitrability of a grievance is for the arbitrator to resolveMatter of Board of Educ. of Schenectady City School Dist. v Schenectady Fedn. of Teachers, 2009 NY Slip Op 02716, Decided on April 9, 2009, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe collective bargaining agreement (CBA) between the Schenectady City School District and the Schenectady Federation of Teachers provided that "[a]ll teachers may be required… [read post]
14 Aug 2011, 9:00 pm
City of Schenectady, ___A.D.3d____(3d Dep't May 5, 2011), is an interesting case. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:21 am
Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things, ”permanently enjoined” Schenectady from permitting the public to attend disciplinary hearings involving City of Schenectady… [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 4:00 am
" The Court of Appeals then noted that it "answered that question in the affirmative five years later" in Matter of City of Watertown v State of New York Public Employment Relations Board, 95 NY2d 73 [Watertown], holding that "the procedures for contesting the City's determinations under section 207-c are a mandatory subject of bargaining. [read post]
5 Feb 2016, 4:00 am
Relations Bd., 2016 NY Slip Op 00729, Appellate Division, Third DepartmentThe City of Schenectady [Schenectady], under color of §133 of Article 9 of Second Class Cities Law,* announced that it would no longer be bound by negotiated police disciplinary procedures then set out in a collective bargaining agreement between Schenectadyand the Schenectady Police Benevolent Association [PBA]. [read post]
30 May 2011, 5:19 pm
From the New York Public Personnel Law written by Harvey Randall: Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Disciplinary hearings involving police officers are open to the public Matter of Doe v City of Schenectady, 2011 NY Slip Op 03694, Appellate Division, Third Department The City of Schenectady appealed an order and judgment of the Supreme Court Judge Barry Kramer that among other things,… [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:58 am
Arbitrating the interpretation of a collective bargaining agreementCity of Schenectady v Schenectady PBA, 289 AD2d 814 The applicable collective bargaining agreement [CBA] between the City of Schenectady and the Schenectady PBA provided that “all police department employees ... will be provided retirement benefits based upon their average earnings during the 12-month period prior to his or her retirement pursuant to Retirement and Social Security… [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
Court of Appeal to determine whether the Taylor Law trumps Second Class Cities Law with respect to negotiating police disciplinary proceduresAppeal of Matter of City of Schenectady v New York State Pub. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 2:12 am
Obtaining police personnel records pursuant to a Freedom of Information Law [FOIL] demandDaily Gazette Co. and Capital Newspapers [Times Union] v City of Schenectady, 93 NY2d 145The Court of Appeals has resolved a significant question in ruling that the City of Schenectady did not violate the state Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) when it declined to provide journalists with the names of certain police officers who were involved in an off-duty egg-throwing… [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Articles by Dr. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
Airborne Particulate Matter (PM) Articles by Dr. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 95 NY2d 73, 78 [2000]; see Civil Service Law § 200 et seq., as added by L 1967, ch 392; Matter of City of Schenectady, 30 NY3d at 114).4. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 6:00 am
Relations Bd., 95 NY2d 73, 78 [2000]; see Civil Service Law § 200 et seq., as added by L 1967, ch 392; Matter of City of Schenectady, 30 NY3d at 114).4. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:20 pm
[See, also, Matter of Patrolmen's Benevolent Assn. of City of N.Y., Inc. v New York State Pub. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 6:00 am
The Appellate Division then held that "the repeal of Civil Rights Law §50-a applies retroactively to records created prior to June 12, 2020", citing Schenectady Police Benevolent Assn. v City of Schenectady, 2020 WL 7978093; 2020 NY Slip Op 34346[U]. [read post]
