Search for: "Matter of Commissioner of Social Servs. v Smith" Results 1 - 20 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2020, 5:02 am by Eugene Volokh
Even if a City policy burdens the free exercise of religion, it might nonetheless be constitutional if it serves a compelling governmental purpose in the least restrictive way. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 1:21 am by INFORRM
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) is investigating. [read post]
30 Jan 2024, 9:02 pm by renholding
I dissent from the Commission’s denial of a petition to amend Rule 202.5(e), our so-called gag rule.[1]  This de facto rule follows from the Commission’s enforcement of its policy, adopted in 1972, that it will not “permit a defendant or respondent to consent to a judgment or order that imposes a sanction while denying the allegations in the complaint or order for proceedings. [read post]
17 Nov 2020, 7:40 pm by Linda McClain
To Justice Barrett’s question about a social service agency raising a religious objection to interracial marriage, Windham answered by citing to Loving v. [read post]
16 Feb 2020, 4:52 pm by INFORRM
Internet and Social Media Bloomberg reports that 400 million social media users are set to lose their anonymity in India under new rules to be published shortly. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 11:17 pm by Schachtman
Historians, often of the subspecies social, labor, or Marxist, have frequently been recruited by the lawsuit industry to support their litigation efforts. [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final ... then… [read post]
21 Sep 2008, 5:59 pm
Commissioner of Social Security    Western District of Tennessee at Memphis 08a0562n.06  Reda v. [read post]
20 Jun 2021, 9:05 pm by Amanda Shanor
By a 5-4 vote in Tandon v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
 A warning about an inherent risk – a so-called “risk warning” – serves an entirely different purpose.With inherent risks, people are warned so they can decide whether that risk outweighs the benefits that might be gained from using the product. [read post]
6 Feb 2024, 3:36 pm by Marty Lederman
  But Colorado is not requiring that ballot exclusion in order to prevent Trump from serving as President, or in order to “enforce” Section 3 in any other way. [read post]
22 May 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
On 19-20 May 2022, there was a hearing in Graeme Smith & 375 Others v Talk Talk Telecom Group PLC before Saini J. [read post]