Search for: "Matter of Coughlin v Coughlin" Results 1 - 20 of 85
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2007, 6:35 am
On Nov. 3, 2005, I wrote:One can understand why Wal-Mart is upset that a former executive, Tom Coughlin, allegedly swiped a half-million dollars, and wants to stop paying him in addition to referring the matter to federal prosecutors. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 5:29 am
Coughlin answered the complaint.Infinity Headwear & Apparel, LLC v. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 5:45 am
One of the more interesting briefs filed on Monday in Charter (Stoneridge v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 4:07 am
”In affirming the lower court’s decision the Appellate Division observed that Supreme Court’s “findings of fact, based in large measure on its assessment of the credibility of the witnesses,” were supported by a fair interpretation of the record evidence.Addressing Buric allegations that “he was given two unpalatable choices,* or that he chose the service retirement due to financial considerations,” the Appellate Division said that neither constituted… [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" * In Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the court said that the threat to file formal disciplinary charges if the employee did not resign does not constitute duress as it is not duress to threaten to do what one has the legal right to do.The decision is posted on the Internet at:http://www.nycourts.gov/reporter/3dseries/2014/2014_01905.htm===================The Discipline Book, - a concise guide to disciplinary actions involving public employees in New York State. [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are… [read post]
5 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing yet another aspect of Appeal 1, the Appellate Division, citing Konigsberg v Coughlin, 68 NY2d 245, opined that "Contrary to [Plaintiff's] further contention in appeal No. 1, [Supreme Court] did not err in remitting the matter to [Respondents] to reconsider [Plaintiff's] request, provide a privilege log, and ultimately comply with its statutory obligations and thus any decision concerning Plaintiff's entitlement to attorney's fees are… [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 2:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
”* Concerning the issue obtaining an "involuntary resignation," in Rychlick v Coughlin, 63 NY2d 643, the Court of Appeals  pointed out that threatening to do what the appointing authority had a right to do -- in this instance filing disciplinary charges against the employee if the employee did not submit his resignation from his position -- did not constitute coercion so as to make the resignation involuntary. [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
In the Matter of the Arbitration between Unit 8251, Local 842, CSEA v City of Troy, the basic issue was the effect of an employee's pre-arbitration resignation on his or her right to demand arbitration. [read post]
23 May 2008, 1:41 am
Matter of Riley v Commissioner of Labor, 2008 NY Slip Op 04588, Decided on May 22, 2008, Appellate Division, Third Department The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board rejected Kristine E. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
12 Mar 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
** In Tulloch v Coughlin, 50 F.3d 114, the US Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, considered the differences between “absolute immunity” and “qualified immunity. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
Further, in Graham v Coughlin, 72 NY2d 1014, the Court of Appeals upheld the removal of a state correction officer following his conviction of a felony under federal law. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a) requires that the records sought be "reasonably described," an agency denying a FOIL request for lack of a reasonable description "bears the burden to establish that the descriptions were insufficient for purposes of locating and identifying the documents sought" (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York State Police, 207 AD3d 971, 974 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 9:30 pm by Public Employment Law Press
While Public Officers Law § 89 (3) (a) requires that the records sought be "reasonably described," an agency denying a FOIL request for lack of a reasonable description "bears the burden to establish that the descriptions were insufficient for purposes of locating and identifying the documents sought" (Matter of Jewish Press, Inc. v New York State Police, 207 AD3d 971, 974 [3d Dept 2022] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted]; see Matter… [read post]