Search for: "Matter of Davis v Williams" Results 21 - 40 of 469
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jul 2023, 9:02 pm by Vikram David Amar
But even these two Justices were forced to address (and ultimately chose to embrace) Smiley, (its predecessor Davis v. [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 3:33 pm by John Elwood
 CVSG: 5/18/2023 (relisted after the June 22 conference) Davis v. [read post]
1 May 2023, 7:46 am by INFORRM
On the same days, Heather Williams J heard the libel trial in the case of Mehmood v Up and Coming TV Limited. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 3:48 am by Seán Binder
” The memo has become the basis for Republican lawmakers accusing the FBI of developing an anti-Catholic bias in the wake of last year’s Supreme Court decision overturning Roe v. [read post]
18 Mar 2023, 8:03 am by Guest Author
At the oral arguments in two currently pending Supreme Court cases—United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2023, 1:07 pm by Dennis Crouch
  Many start with and later add investors to ongoing funds and matters. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
After all, the first secessionists met in Hartford in 1814, and William Lloyd Garrison famously endorsed “no Union with slaveholders. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 8:22 am by Derek T. Muller
Again, focusing just on the existing USNWR “top 50” for now:POTENTIAL LOSERS, PEER CHANGE:UC-Irvine (20 v. 37)Washington (36 v. 49)Colorado (36 v. 49)UC-Davis (24 v. 37)Wisconsin (31 v. 43)Boston College (27 v. 37)Emory (20 v. 30)There are a few others in the middle of some interest, because near the top smaller variations matter more. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
Relatedly, some members of today’s Court who have great respect for Chief Justice William Rehnquist (the author of a very relevant concurrence in Bush v. [read post]