Search for: "Matter of Dennison"
Results 21 - 40
of 66
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jul 2007, 1:15 am
Dennison U.S. [read post]
16 Apr 2007, 3:27 am
Dennison, respondent-appellant
NEW YORK COUNTYCriminal PracticeMotion to Dismiss Charge of Endangering Welfare of Child for Facial Insufficiency Granted People v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 6:00 am
For historians, this is exactly why they matter. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 10:59 am
I have always been a neophyte when it comes to matters involving the Internet. [read post]
31 May 2012, 11:42 am
Avery Dennison Corp., 673 F.3d 1372, 1377 (Fed. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 5:21 am
If adopted, the channel would be available in a future FM auction for those interested in the construction of a new FM station to serve Dennison. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:37 am
Sumpton, 189 F.3d 868, 879 (9th Cir. 1999) (marks used for decades and parent company had annual sales of $3 billion and annual advertising costs of over $5 million; no fame).No matter. [read post]
20 Nov 2007, 12:14 am
Dennison
Subscription Required
U.S. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 2:52 pm
But David Dennison/Donald Trump has a “performance problem. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 8:38 am
In addition to Rule 52(a), the Court also stated that clear error review was supported by precedent (citing a 1950 Learned Hand opinion on claim construction and the Supreme Court's 1986 Dennison opinion on obviousness) and by "practical considerations": Patent law "depends on familiarity with specific scientific problems and principles," and district judges have "a comparatively greater opportunity to gain that familiarity. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 6:48 am
Meanwhile, a third eligibility case of Avery Dennison v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 7:22 am
He concludes that corporations could “easily place the matter on the agenda of the annual shareholder meeting”; if the expenditures are good for business, then shareholders would likely approve them. [read post]
18 May 2008, 8:32 am
The court was guided by Avery Dennison Corp. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 10:40 am
Avery Dennison Corp. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 10:05 am
Dennison Mfg. [read post]
11 May 2018, 4:00 am
Although Congress apparently cannot withdraw the original subject matter jurisdiction of the Supreme Court, it can determine the suability of foreign nations under its power to regulate foreign commerce, as the court held in Verlinden v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 12:31 pm
Avery Dennison decision issued on April 17, because “our case law compels that we exercise subject matter jurisdiction over it. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 3:16 pm
Avery Dennison Corp., 673 F.3d 1372, 1378 (Fed. [read post]
21 Feb 2008, 4:47 pm
Along with that family, I will forever be grateful I called upon HORP&B to handle the matter. [read post]
16 Apr 2013, 8:30 pm
Avery Dennison Corp., 350 F.3d1365, 1371 (Fed. [read post]
