Search for: "Matter of Dougherty" Results 81 - 100 of 220
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2017, 8:02 am by DLP Law
”   The post DLP Attorney John Finnerty Receives AV Peer Review Rating™ from Martindale-Hubbell® appeared first on Dougherty, Leventhal & Price, LLP. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 8:39 am by WSLL
Dougherty, Dougherty Law Office, P.C., Cheyenne, Wyoming.Representing Appellees: Peter K. [read post]
21 Feb 2013, 10:45 am by Daniel E. Cummins
.), the court reviewed a matter involving a lawsuit filed after a person was allegedly injured in an accident with a bus. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 10:50 am by Daniel E. Cummins
Progressive denied the claimant's UIM claim.In this matter, the injured party claimant argued that an issue of fact existed as to whether the vehicle was being used "regularly" by teh claimant since other people also drove the vehicle and since the claimant did not operate it 100% of the time. [read post]
25 May 2010, 8:52 pm by James F. Aspell
I had a hand in defending the Cessario v Meriden matter at my former firm, and never in my wildest dreams would I have envisioned the result the trial commissioner reached, let alone have it affirmed by the CRB. [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 6:32 am by Daniel E. Cummins
In an uninsured motorist benefits case that has gone all the way up the appellate ladder, back down again, and, now, all the way back up, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court in the matter of Vanderhoff v. [read post]
3 May 2016, 5:34 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
  The court noted that a defendant can not transform a matter into a federal question case by injecting a federal law defense into the matter for purposes of the removal issue.Judge Mariani also rejected the carrier's contention that the MSPA completely preempted State law. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Dougherty, Tarter Krinsky & Drogin, LLP, Iona College (hereinafter Iona), and Kathleen McElroy. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
On appeal, the 10th Circuit concluded that the trial judge should not have allowed the case against the school board to go to the jury, finding as a matter of law that the school board had not delegated its hiring decisions to Dougherty and thus could not be held liable based solely on his violation of constitutional rights. [read post]
15 Mar 2022, 8:05 am by Dan Bressler
Archer’s general counsel also certified that Dougherty had no access to the file in the present matter, according to the appeals decision. [read post]
30 Dec 2012, 1:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
I send thanks to Attorney Paul Oven of the Moosic, PA law firm of Dougherty, Leventhal & Price for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]