Search for: "Matter of Durudogan v City of New York" Results 1 - 3 of 3
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Durudogan v City of New York, 134 AD3d 452, the Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court had correctly determined that although  Plaintiff had slightly more than 10 years of service with the Department, he forfeited any entitlement to vested retirement benefits upon his dismissal by operation of law pursuant to Public Officers Law §30(1)(e). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Citing Matter of Durudogan v City of New York, 134 AD3d 452, the Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court had correctly determined that although  Plaintiff had slightly more than 10 years of service with the Department, he forfeited any entitlement to vested retirement benefits upon his dismissal by operation of law pursuant to Public Officers Law §30(1)(e). [read post]