Search for: "Matter of Durudogan v City of New York"
Results 1 - 3
of 3
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jan 2016, 4:00 am
*Durudogan appealed and Supreme Court, New York County, granted City of New York’s motion to dismiss his Article 78 petition. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Citing Matter of Durudogan v City of New York, 134 AD3d 452, the Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court had correctly determined that although Plaintiff had slightly more than 10 years of service with the Department, he forfeited any entitlement to vested retirement benefits upon his dismissal by operation of law pursuant to Public Officers Law §30(1)(e). [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 9:00 am
Citing Matter of Durudogan v City of New York, 134 AD3d 452, the Appellate Division ruled that Supreme Court had correctly determined that although Plaintiff had slightly more than 10 years of service with the Department, he forfeited any entitlement to vested retirement benefits upon his dismissal by operation of law pursuant to Public Officers Law §30(1)(e). [read post]