Search for: "Matter of Fall v City of New York"
Results 1 - 20
of 839
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Jul 2015, 4:00 am
Advisory opinions of the New York City Corporation Counsel2015 NY Slip Op 05887, Appellate Division, First DepartmentIn this action a trustee [Trustee] on the Police Pension Fund (PPF) Board of Trustees sought a court order prohibiting the New York City Corporation Counsel from providing statutory interpretation and legal direction to the New York City Police Pension Fund Medical Board regarding the application of… [read post]
20 Feb 2017, 9:31 am
New York City has some of the strongest employee rights protections in the country. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 6:39 am
City of New York U.S. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 9:57 am
The Second Department recently reversed an initial summary judgment ruling in favor of the City of New York. [read post]
28 Oct 2012, 7:45 am
This blog post is directed to my fellow New York personal injury lawyers who might have trip and fall cases from Buffalo, New York, but also it is worth reading if you have been injured by a defective sidewalk in the City of Buffalo, NY. [read post]
25 Feb 2010, 3:22 am
Slip and fall due to the employee’s wet shoes held an accident for the purposes of qualifying for accidental disability retirement benefitsMatter of Leary v New York City Employees' Retirement Sys., 59 AD3d 547More often than not an application for accidental disability retirement benefits is rejected on the grounds that the event leading to the injury resulting in the filing of the application for such a benefit did not constitute an… [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 5:25 am
New York City Hous. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 4:15 am
*The Appellate Division, citing Matter of Lichtenstein v Board of Trustees of Police Pension Fund of Police Dept. [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 4:45 pm
The recent ruling falls in line with the 2005 decision by the Supreme Court in Kelo v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 11:53 am
The court held that the alleged statements did not fall under any privilege established by New York law. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 8:04 am
Notably, "blanket exemptions for particular types of documents are inimical to FOIL's policy of open government" (Matter of Gould v New York City Police Dept., 89 NY2d 267, 275 [1996]; accord Matter of Thomas v New York City Dept. of Educ., 103 AD3d 495, 498 [2013]; Matter of New York State Defenders Assn. v New York State Police, 87 AD3d 193,… [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 4:18 am
Realty Corp., 28 AD3d 434; Golba v City of New York, 27 AD3d 524; Tejada v Jonas, 17 AD3d 448). [read post]
15 Jan 2013, 10:09 am
In October 2012, the Supreme Court Appellate Division, First Department, affirmed an order granting summary judgment to the New York City Transit Authority in a matter involving a slip and fall at a subway station. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:33 pm
It’s the sad truth living in New York City, a population in the millions, but you so often hear of the story of someone who was working (rather happily) and was suddenly fired – this news coming as a total surprise. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:33 pm
It’s the sad truth living in New York City, a population in the millions, but you so often hear of the story of someone who was working (rather happily) and was suddenly fired – this news coming as a total surprise. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:33 pm
It’s the sad truth living in New York City, a population in the millions, but you so often hear of the story of someone who was working (rather happily) and was suddenly fired – this news coming as a total surprise. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:33 pm
It’s the sad truth living in New York City, a population in the millions, but you so often hear of the story of someone who was working (rather happily) and was suddenly fired – this news coming as a total surprise. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 9:33 pm
It’s the sad truth living in New York City, a population in the millions, but you so often hear of the story of someone who was working (rather happily) and was suddenly fired – this news coming as a total surprise. [read post]
19 Jun 2013, 12:56 pm
City of New York, Respondent. [read post]
15 Nov 2014, 11:41 am
”In New York, a prior consistent statement may not be introduced to prove the truth of the statement. [read post]
