Search for: "Matter of Fennelly v Eastchester Fire Dist."
Results 1 - 1
of 1
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2017, 4:00 am
"As to Eastchester recouping "past overpayments" from Fennelly, the Appellate Division, citing Matter of Masullo v City of Mount Vernon, 141 AD3d 95, said that "[t]here is no evidence that [Eastchester] had a process or application procedure in place at the time [Fennelly] was paid the section 207-a(2) benefits and, therefore, there can be no finding that the prior payments were improper so as to justify recoupment. [read post]