Search for: "Matter of Finkelstein v Finkelstein"
Results 1 - 20
of 48
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Nov 2008, 1:25 pm
In Matter of Perito v. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 3:07 am
Heller v Yannitelli, 525 [*3]US 1178; Pessoni v Rabkin, 220 AD2d 732; Matter of Winston, 214 AD2d 677). [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:45 pm
All dialogue is actual and taken from the transcript on the Broward Blog in State v. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 12:04 am
The Minister has released ACIP’s report into what should be patentable subject matter under Australian law. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 8:02 am
There is no dispute that Antilla included certain facts tending to support the short sellers’ story: Howard Finkelstein was a convicted felon who had, in fact, used the alias “Robert Howard,” see United States v. [read post]
13 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
In Doviak v. [read post]
8 May 2022, 8:57 am
For instance, in a 1998 seminal case on the matter Kass v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 1:18 pm
Although the penalties were jointly submitted as agreed, the matter was hard fought as can be seen from Cabcharge’s media release. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 2:47 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
23 Apr 2010, 3:10 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 2:57 am
" However, the documentary evidence demonstrated that the plaintiff's individual liability on the notes was a matter outside of the scope of the defendants' representation of the plaintiff in her capacity as co-executor of the estate (see CPLR 3211[a][1]; AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 435; DeNatale v Santangelo, 65 AD3d 1006, 1007; Turner v Irving Finkelstein & Meirowitz, LLP, 61 AD3d 849, 850). [*2]" [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 4:12 am
That the matter was resolved by stipulation does not make a difference. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:03 am
Pavone v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 9:19 pm
"The fugitive disentitlement doctrine permits a court to dismiss an appeal if the party seeking relief is a fugitive while the matter is pending' (Degen v United States, 517 US 820, 824 [1996]; see Ortega-Rodriguez v United States, 507 US 234, 242 [1993]). [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 4:41 am
NYCERS v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:35 am
See CPLR 4503(a)(1); Lue v Finkelstein & Partners. [read post]
23 Mar 2022, 3:28 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint based on documentary evidence “may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes [the] plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 3:11 am
A motion to dismiss a complaint based on documentary evidence “may be appropriately granted only where the documentary evidence utterly refutes [the] plaintiff’s factual allegations, conclusively establishing a defense as a matter of law” (Goshen v Mutual Life Ins. [read post]
18 May 2011, 2:19 am
Matters get rather murky after that. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:01 am
”Jackson v. [read post]
