Search for: "Matter of Grant v New York City Hous. Auth." Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Nov 2022, 5:30 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
3 May 2023, 9:43 am
The First Department clapped back at the Second Department in Estate of Murphy, v New York City Hous. [read post]
15 Oct 2011, 6:49 am
Rochester City School District, decided by The New York Appellate Division, 4th Department on October 7, 2011, the construction worker sustained injury when he fell from a collapsing scaffold at a construction site. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 8:29 am
Both decisions can be found on the New York State Law Reporting Bureau website: Arocho v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 2:52 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Univ., 122 AD2d at 197; Page v City of New York, 79 AD2d 573; Cetta v City of New [*2]York, 46 AD2d 762; Budner v Giunta, 16 AD2d 780; cf. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 3:25 am
A jury should make those determinations (see Cammon v City of New York, 21 AD3d 196, 200, 799 N.Y.S.2d 455 [2005]). [read post]
20 Dec 2009, 12:49 pm
In response to NYL's denial that an express warranty was made to the Maloneys, the plaintiffs failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Weiss v Polymer Plastics Corp., 21 AD3d 1095, 1097; Davis v New York City Hous. [read post]
11 Sep 2018, 4:26 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
& Community Renewal, 66 AD3d at 682; JCD Farms v Juul-Nielsen, 300 AD2d at 446; Plotkin v New York City Tr. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
26 May 2019, 5:23 pm by Public Employment Law Press
"To the extent that Plaintiff did not establish actual notice because she did not specify that her description of the assault included a recitation of who was in the room, the Appellate Division opined that "municipal authorities have an obligation to obtain the missing information if that can be done with a modicum of effort," citing Goodwin v New York City Hous. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 3:03 pm
Here, by contrast, application of Vehicle and Traffic Law § 1104 to grant defendants' summary judgment motion would require this Court to decide disputed factual issues concerning the circumstances of the accident (Foster v New York City Hous. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Hinds-Radix, Corporation Counsel, New York (Philip Young, Richard Dearing and Devin Slack of counsel), for Bill DeBlasio, Mayor of New York City, New York City Department of Education and Meisha Porter, Chancellor of the New York City Department of Education, respondents.Dennis J. [read post]
18 Mar 2014, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
[See, for example, DeMarco v City of Albany, 75 AD2d 674, Amkraut v Hults, 21 AD2d 260].* See Civil Service Law §75 [3].** N.B. [read post]